Hey morans - RE:Ducking

[Brinkman]

You will no longer be able to sit while using items or casting spells

Kewl so if they are doing this, then they should allow us to sit while casting right?

Or are we doing that whole Classic .... but only when we want to thing again?


And yes please quote rogean saying " custom Classic ".

If you do that, then stop saying "classic" at all, you cannot argue classic, then 2 posts later claim its not

[PVPBetaChamps]

Originally Posted by Brinkman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kewl so if they are doing this, then they should allow us to sit while casting right?

Or are we doing that whole Classic .... but only when we want to thing again?


And yes please quote rogean saying " custom Classic ".

If you do that, then stop saying "classic" at all, you cannot argue classic, then 2 posts later claim its not

what the fuck are you talking about

[gloinz]

morons* [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[PVPBetaChamps]

Originally Posted by gloinz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

morons* [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Booglie]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

[oldfish]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

Right. I remember chanters fearing people off cliffs in EC, major lulz

[PVPBetaChamps]

Originally Posted by oldfish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Right. I remember chanters fearing people off cliffs in EC, major lulz

OH DO YOU BRO? DO YOU?

[Bazia]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

No one gives a poop about what you want [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

So your argument is.. You want fear, charm, and spells to work classically because you think ducking shouldn't interrupt spells. As relevant as these topics aren't, I agree it should be as classic as possible.

[Booglie]

not all all nilblog. i just think the argument "look this is how it was when eq started" isn't a good argument when its only applied selectively.
if most people think the no ducking is for the better, fine, i can respect that. but having betapvpchamp imply that because it was in classic automatically makes it right is a crap answer.