Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2011, 06:29 PM
Labyrrinth Labyrrinth is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St Louis
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It does though because Froog is painting this as a lynch case. Trial and execution without any proof.

What mistakes were made?

Amelinda said she had been watching them box for some time. They demanded proof and when none was supplied they assumed it was for tinfoil hat reasons. Were they expecting a list of sins written on a golden scroll? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What does the GM have to gain by banning the innocent? If they were wrong, and the evidence supplied by Froog was even somewhat plausible they would likely open the account back up for investigation. This isn't a cover-up for the GM's to save face.

If it walks like a 2boxer and talks like a 2boxer it's probably a 2boxer.
So it seems you are of the opinion that in this instance, there's no way the GM in question could have made a mistake....

Regardless of your answer I will repeat that "incentive" doesn't play a role. No one is saying she banned an innocent person on purpose. It was likely either a ban that was done with irrefutable evidence or it was a ban done with evidence that, if examined, would be iffy at best - a ban hammer mistakenly thrown.

IF it was a mistake, at this point it is also likely she is not going to go back and examine the evidence. Like so many others that are often proven wrong, it's easier to deny and dig your heals in defending your stance then it is to actually step back, listen, and admit a mistake was made. Happens ALL the time, in every aspect of life, which is also why I said to Froog that regardless of whether he is guilty or not, it's probably best to stop wasting his energy on this and move on.
__________________
India - cleric
Labyrrinth - enchanter
Last edited by Labyrrinth; 10-18-2011 at 06:39 PM..
  #2  
Old 10-19-2011, 06:49 AM
Froog Froog is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Labyrrinth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
which is also why I said to Froog that regardless of whether he is guilty or not, it's probably best to stop wasting his energy on this and move on.
Ya, you are probably right. I guess I should try to start over here, and keep the hope alive that a gm will look intio into the matter at some point.

Thank you to everyone who posted support here and in PM's. It helped great deal to know that the sense of community that was so prevailant in the beginning of this server hasn't been totally lost.
Sigh, time to be on the opposite side here.

Although this hurts my pride, the thought of starting all over again with zilch on a well established server specially after losing everything seems worse.

If anyone has any lowbie mage itms they can spare or even a few platt for spells >< I would greatly appreciate it. I can promise you I will pay you back at some point, but it might take a while. or if you prefer, I can do what we asked of people when we gave out stuff, I can "pay it forward" when I am in a better position to do so.

If you think you might have something you can spare, toss me a PM or a tell IG, I decided to play a class that i havent yet on Classic and I started a mage named Forlorn.
  #3  
Old 10-19-2011, 01:21 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,659
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Labyrrinth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So it seems you are of the opinion that in this instance, there's no way the GM in question could have made a mistake....

Regardless of your answer I will repeat that "incentive" doesn't play a role. No one is saying she banned an innocent person on purpose. It was likely either a ban that was done with irrefutable evidence or it was a ban done with evidence that, if examined, would be iffy at best - a ban hammer mistakenly thrown.

IF it was a mistake, at this point it is also likely she is not going to go back and examine the evidence. Like so many others that are often proven wrong, it's easier to deny and dig your heals in defending your stance then it is to actually step back, listen, and admit a mistake was made. Happens ALL the time, in every aspect of life, which is also why I said to Froog that regardless of whether he is guilty or not, it's probably best to stop wasting his energy on this and move on.
You lost me in the rhetoric. Are you literally asking for my thoughts or just toying with me because you already have your mind made up? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lets get real here: Anything is possible. Could the GM have made a mistake? I don't know, is it possible to pass-out and drown in a bowl of soup?

I had more here with my reasoning but realized I just don't care. If she didn't cheat maybe she can teach her son to avoid running from GM's in the future or how to use /t.
Last edited by Snaggles; 10-19-2011 at 03:11 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.