Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 03-27-2010, 10:30 AM
TheDudeAbides TheDudeAbides is offline
Kobold

TheDudeAbides's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rophel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're missing the point again. The warrior can effectively tank while doing relatively alright DPS (depending on gear). The cleric can keep him up so that he can continue to chain pull mobs. Enchanter provides the DPS with charm, some blasts, can handle adds, pumps mana to cleric through Clarity. It's simply the best trio in the game and is very damage effective, and if it's not it's because the enchanter is doing something wrong.
You don't need a warrior to tank when the charmed pet is a vastly superior tank and does 10 times the DPS with haste a warrior could ever hope to do

Yes that includes raid encounters
  #82  
Old 03-27-2010, 04:58 PM
Bayleo Bayleo is offline
Kobold

Bayleo's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 131
Default

for kunark, nothing is going to beat monk/sham/necro. not even close. also sham/monk can duo, as can sham/necro.
  #83  
Old 03-27-2010, 05:29 PM
Alawen Everywhere Alawen Everywhere is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 414
Default

I should start by saying that my permanent groups always involved a warrior and a cleric. One that went far was a foursome of warrior/cleric/shaman/monk. We did not travel or level particularly quickly, but we were extremely rugged and could pick up two strangers of most any class and do well.

I was in a leveling group on Stromm that was warrior/cleric/enchanter/mage/rogue. Our usual sixth was a monk but he didn't play a very large role. This group was much faster but less durable.

I knew two extremely successful four-boxers. One played warrior/cleric/enchanter/rogue and the other played warrior/cleric/enchanter/wizard.

What I infer from these data points is that the warrior/cleric/slower trio needs at least one pure dps buddy always available. To be successful as a trio, abilities need to be more condensed. I know two ways to accomplish this successfully.

The first approach retains the tank/healer/slower approach in two characters, shadowknight and shaman. The knight also serves as effective puller. The third member should be pure dps. Rogue is probably best with the shaman buffs, but int casters or rangers for utility are interesting alternatives.

The other approach I've seen work effectively is to desert the tank paradigm in favor of a pet and go with pure casters. The best setup I've seen is cleric/enchanter/magician and it was very impressive.

I'm not much for theorycrafting, so these examples are all from real combos I've seen work and not work. My own three characters on live were warrior, cleric and druid. I had crazy mana regen and lots of clicks and procs to make it work, but my dps was awful and aggro was always touchy until I had very high end aggro weapons. On the other hand, I could port all over quickly after a server reset, the druid worked well for pulling outdoor zones and I could succor when things went bad.

I think the choice of a trio comes down to utility versus efficiency, but interestingly I don't think utility necessarily increases overall capability. The cleric/chanter/mage trio also works well starting with no gear at all while the shadowknight/shaman/rogue trio scale nicely with Kunark and Velious gear.

I enjoyed seeing everyone's ideas in this thread.
  #84  
Old 03-27-2010, 10:48 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alawen Everywhere [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Really smart stuff.
I like both of your picks actually, especially shd/shm/rog mostly after kunark drops, but I think you glaze over the dps output of enchanters on p99 specifically and don't give credit (partially coz I didn't really say it - but I figured those that know, know) to the idea that the warrior is mostly there to pull, initiate rooms, and cover mistakes. Mage pets can't do that kind of stuff as well as a person who's only job it is to do so.
__________________
  #85  
Old 03-28-2010, 12:47 AM
Auvdar Auvdar is offline
Fire Giant

Auvdar's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 526
Default

cmon kids, war + cleric + enchanter is the triforce. We all know this.
__________________
Auvdar -- Divinity, 60 Druid. Retired.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Barfight
"President, its time to shut the fuck up."
  #86  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:46 PM
Malavan Malavan is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
Default

while we're all bored, i'd like to see some more opinions on this. Right now i'm trying to get a 3rd friend to come play. We all played when the game came out and have since played everything under the sun. That said, we're looking for a good trio and had considered doing the war/cleric/enc thing, though after reading this, we may try something a little different.

I can't remember how well a shaman could heal pre-kunark, but that'd be fun to pair with a SK/bard duo
  #87  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:53 PM
karsten karsten is offline
Planar Protector

karsten's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,892
Default

applebees appetizer menu
__________________
Noah, the Loincloth Hero
Ogre High Jump Champion 2019
  #88  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:15 PM
Drubu Drubu is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 10
Default

yeah honestly tank + cleric + chanter would be your best bet longterm. then you can just grab the million dps that are always LFG. No porter would suck though but there are a million druids around just befriend one/two.
  #89  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:54 PM
rioisk rioisk is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 271
Default

Don't do warrior, do SK for pulling (FD).

SK, Cleric, Enchanter.
  #90  
Old 04-10-2010, 08:44 PM
Malrubius Malrubius is offline
Fire Giant

Malrubius's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmay1011 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can anyone offer suggestions on some good 3-man group setups?
No, but I've seen some damn nice 3-woman group setups. badaboom!

Sorry, just the way you asked the question [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.