Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2011, 05:28 AM
greatdane greatdane is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 684
Default

I don't have anything of value to add, but it really surprises me just how insignificant of a difference there was between warrior and knight numbers. They're mostly less than 1% apart, confirming my belief that there really is no tangible advantage to a warrior tank (other than slightly higher HP) until defensive discipline comes into the picture.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2011, 03:04 PM
Treats Treats is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greatdane [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't have anything of value to add, but it really surprises me just how insignificant of a difference there was between warrior and knight numbers. They're mostly less than 1% apart, confirming my belief that there really is no tangible advantage to a warrior tank (other than slightly higher HP) until defensive discipline comes into the picture.
Yep, there are really only a few things that factored into the AC equation that made a Warrior a better tank than a Hybrid. Pre-Kunark was even closer.

Warrior Defense Cap 252 and Class AC Bonus
Paladin/Shadowknight Defense Cap 230 and Class AC Bonus

Pre-Kunark:

Warrior Defense Cap 210
Paladin/Shadowknight Defense Cap 200
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2011, 07:26 AM
Treats Treats is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 981
Default

Added Class Bonuses from Raw AC
Added Iksar Race Bonus
Better Table for Agility
Figured Human/Iksar Monk Hardcap -- May not be correct
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-16-2011, 07:47 PM
Werlop Werlop is offline
Kobold

Werlop's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 176
Default

So if this is accurate, monks should be even better? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-16-2011, 11:30 PM
Pudge Pudge is offline
Planar Protector

Pudge's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,523
Default

wow - awesome post! great research
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2011, 04:41 AM
Treats Treats is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Werlop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So if this is accurate, monks should be even better? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The numbers are very high for them. Keep in mind though that those caps were not even attainable for a Monk until high end Velious (ToV/Dain/Yelinak/Tormax/etc) with multiple pieces of all/all gear. The Warrior/Hybrids are still equipping Plate and the Monk is still equipping Leather with an added factor of weight (Monk goes over - loses AC) in Kunark.

Comparison in Raw AC from Best in Slot gear in Kunark era:

Warrior - 291 Raw AC
Monk - 135 Raw AC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2011, 12:29 PM
Treats Treats is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 981
Default

Added the numbers on Raw AC for Casters (Nec/Wiz/Mag/Ench). Used Raw AC Level Cap from other classes.

(Raw AC * 4) / 3

60 - (289 * 4) / 3 = 385
59 - (275 * 4) / 3 = 366
And so on
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2021, 10:53 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,736
Default

Sorry for necro, I've been looking for a replacement source for the Agility table linked to in the OP, which is now a dead link.

This thread seems the most appropriate place to dump it and the details for prosperity. The numbers in my link seem accurate, though incomplete. They resemble what I remember being in the original link. I hope to one day find another copy of the complete table that was previously posted.

https://www.angelfire.com/rpg/whitew...des/accalc.htm

Also was archived close to classic era, possibly even before the PoP AC revamps:

https://web.archive.org/web/20021229...des/accalc.htm

Code:
		Level		Agility
40+	20-39	7-19	1-6	
-24	-24	-24	-24	1
-23	-23	-23	-23	2-3
-22	-22	-22	-22	4
-21	-21	-21	-21	5-6
-20	-20	-20	-20	7-8
-19	-19	-19	-19	9
-18	-18	-18	-18	10-11
-17	-17	-17	-17	12
-16	-16	-16	-16	 13-14
-15	-15	-15	-15	 15-16
-14	-14	-14	-14	17
-13	-13	-13	-13	 18-19
-12	-12	-12	-12	20
-11	-11	-11	-11	 21-22
-10	-10	-10	-10	 23-24
-9	-9	-9	-9	25
-8	-8	-8	-8	 26-27
-7	-7	-7	-7	28
-6	-6	-6	-6	 29-30
-5	-5	-5	-5	 31-32
-4	-4	-4	-4	33
-3	-3	-3	-3	 34-35
-2	-2	-2	-2	36
-1	-1	-1	-1	 37-38
0	0	0	0	 39-65
1	1	1	1	 66-70
5	5	5	5	 71-74
39	33	23	9	75
40	33	23	10	 76-79
41	34	24	11	80
42	35	25	12	 81-85
42	36	26	12	 86-90
43	36	26	13	 91-95
44	37	27	14	 96-99
45	38	28	15	100
45	??	29		 101-105
46	??	29		 106-110
47	??	30		 111-115
47	??	31		 116-119
48	??	32?		120
49	??	32?		 121-125
50				 126-135
51				136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treats [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Added Class Bonuses from Raw AC
Added Iksar Race Bonus
Better Table for Agility
Figured Human/Iksar Monk Hardcap -- May not be correct
search terms

t from table

agility table

agility tables

avoidance table

avoidance tables

everquest

avoidance from agility
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.