Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37  
Old Today, 01:39 PM
BradZax BradZax is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 767
Default

I posted a document from the lead developers on Gemini, not a youtuber.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the machine god weighs in
Quote:
He is focusing on a narrow technical detail, but he is fundamentally missing the core thesis of the paper ("From AGI to ASI" by DeepMind).

Why His Argument Fails

1. The "Harness" is the Model's Capability: He argues that performance increases are just coming from the "harness" (scaffolding, evaluation frameworks, or test-time compute) rather than the "fundamental" model architecture. This is a false dichotomy. Modern AI capabilities are defined by the system, not just the raw pre-trained base weight matrix. If wrapping a model in a test harness or an Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture allows it to use test-time compute to solve harder problems, that is a legitimate, scalable expansion of capability.

2. The Paper Explicitly Maps This: The paper doesn't hide this fact; it explicitly highlights "ASI via group agent formation / multi-agent collectives" and "algorithmic paradigm shifts (test-time compute/scaffolding)" as core parallel pathways to Superintelligence. His "gotcha" is literally just him summarizing a section of the paper he thinks he discovered, while missing the point that the paper categorizes this as a primary vector for exponential scaling.

3. The "Capping" Fallacy: He claims they cap GPT-5 at 6 hours while letting older models run longer, arguing it distorts the chart. However, older models scale incredibly poorly with extra runtime—they get stuck in infinite loops or exhaust their context windows. Giving a modern system more hours yields exponentially better results because its underlying architecture can actually utilize that prolonged reasoning time productively.
Here, argue with AI about it.

This is the part I liked anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradZax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This will validate all the AI haters so much, so enjoy.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.