![]() |
|
#61
|
||||
|
Quote:
Rangers at 5% the raid comp aren’t a progression bottleneck in 2026. | |||
|
#62
|
||||
|
Quote:
But yes, I play green and I dont see alot of rogue bots. I know Kingdom has Misty Thickest (litrally S tier name) and GG has a couple VP rogue bots. | |||
|
#63
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#64
|
|||
|
ST 100% incentivized leveling rogues in Kunark in preparation for Velious. They gave DKP for people leveling rogues, ran guild power level sessions, etc. It was a thing, but they weren't bots in the traditional sense. The messaging was everyone should have a rogue for Velious. It seemed to go well for them and GG (and its splinters) inherited a mass of rogues this way.
| ||
|
#65
|
|||
|
a few bards made a ton of DKP leveling 5 rogues at a time in DN
after the DN spiders started summoning, they took it to velks, and now thats gone too deso had a little effort called "project lightning" too where we mass leveled wizards that was fun: | ||
|
#66
|
|||
|
If you want proper starting stat advice as a Ranger, don't listen to other Rangers. Their class choice already proves they can't min-max.
The only correct option is +20 Stam. If you put +20 into Str, your character is gimped at level 60. | ||
|
#67
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#68
|
|||
|
Odd viewpoint since this game can be beaten with pretty much just warriors and clerics.
| ||
|
#69
|
|||
|
Your starting stats really don't matter, but if you must min/max for your own sanity:
STR will be the most impactful if untwinked or on a fresh server, and WIS will be the most impactful at end game People who say that STR gimps your char don't know what they are talking about. In fact, it's the right choice for most classes in most situations.
__________________
P99: [60 Grandmaster] Carceret (Human) <Good Guys>
P99: [60 Warder] Bloodraven the Pathfinder (Human) <Good Guys> P99: [60 Sorcerer] Melisandre (Human) <Auld Lang Syne> P99: [52 Champion] Alysane (Barbarian) <Auld Lang Syne> SZ : [65 Lord Protector] Cochise (Erudite) <Sanctus Lumen> | ||
![]() |
|
|