The absolute state of AI results.

[OriginalContentGuy]

Originally Posted by BradZax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ironic you highlight that while you/he thinks freeing the people of iran makes gas too expensive to be worth it.

Quit making shit up about how I think, schmuck.

[BradZax]

Oh please.

[Botten]

$9 Trillion Collapse Machine

[Duik]

Any company that has paddock sized factories to compute Lego Men singing Irans trolling Humpty Trumpty using cities worth of power/water. Something has to give.
With all the money spent the shareholders will want our fucking investment back. No matter how. We dont care. A.I or bust.

[Wayward]

Originally Posted by OriginalContentGuy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quit making shit up about how I think, schmuck.

Bro don't even waste your time trying to converse with ShovelQuest. He lives in his own fuckin world. Probably hasn't seen daylight in years.

[BradZax]

"it will destroy poetry and take all our jerbs"

A few moments later

"it's a collapse machine.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by BradZax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"it will destroy poetry and take all our jerbs"

A few moments later

"it's a collapse machine.

Sure lets have some fun with this. Lets use AI to determine who claimed in the 50+ pages of this thread that "AI was taking all jobs."

Because ShovelQuest's (BradZax) goal here was to invalidate discussion with this recent post.

Botten:  "In this information was it ever stated that AI would take people's jobs and if so who appears to state this?"


Short answer:  
Yes — the document does contain statements that AI will take people’s jobs, and the person making those statements is the forum user shovelquest.

�� Where job‑loss claims appear in the text
User “shovelquest” implies AI will replace human labor
While not as explicit, shovelquest repeatedly frames AI as a tool that can walk someone through complex tasks step‑by‑step — even things they have no background in. For example:

“Say for example you want to make your own P99 server… You could step by step work on that with AI… and be able to learn and accomplish that goal together…”

This isn’t a direct “AI will take jobs” statement, but it does imply that AI can replace specialized human expertise — which is part of the job‑loss conversation.

�� Summary of who said what
Forum User	Did they say AI will take jobs?	Evidence:
shovelquest	Implied	Describes AI replacing expert labor in tasks
branamil	No	Says AI is “Clippy with lipstick,” but no job‑loss claim
sammoHung	No	Focuses on AI inaccuracy, not jobs
loramin	No	Talks about training data, not jobs


�� Why this matters in context
The thread is mostly about AI hallucinating niche gaming info, but it naturally drifts into broader AI commentary. The job‑loss comments appear during a side discussion about:

AI usefulness

Overhyped fears

Whether AI is “just a tool”

How people emotionally project onto AI.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure lets have some fun with this. Lets use AI to determine who claimed in the 50+ pages of this thread that "AI was taking all jobs."

Because ShovelQuest's (BradZax) goal here was to invalidate discussion with this recent post.

Botten:  "In this information was it ever stated that AI would take people's jobs and if so who appears to state this?"


Short answer:  
Yes — the document does contain statements that AI will take people’s jobs, and the person making those statements is the forum user shovelquest.

�� Where job‑loss claims appear in the text
User “shovelquest” implies AI will replace human labor
While not as explicit, shovelquest repeatedly frames AI as a tool that can walk someone through complex tasks step‑by‑step — even things they have no background in. For example:

“Say for example you want to make your own P99 server… You could step by step work on that with AI… and be able to learn and accomplish that goal together…”

This isn’t a direct “AI will take jobs” statement, but it does imply that AI can replace specialized human expertise — which is part of the job‑loss conversation.

�� Summary of who said what
Forum User	Did they say AI will take jobs?	Evidence:
shovelquest	Implied	Describes AI replacing expert labor in tasks
branamil	No	Says AI is “Clippy with lipstick,” but no job‑loss claim
sammoHung	No	Focuses on AI inaccuracy, not jobs
loramin	No	Talks about training data, not jobs


�� Why this matters in context
The thread is mostly about AI hallucinating niche gaming info, but it naturally drifts into broader AI commentary. The job‑loss comments appear during a side discussion about:

AI usefulness

Overhyped fears

Whether AI is “just a tool”

How people emotionally project onto AI.

Pretty sure the tech CEOs said it themselves, but you sure did.

[Reiwa]

Plus the luddite screen actors guild.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure the tech CEOs said it themselves, but you sure did.

Meh, had the AI stick to the information in thread to show it was Shovelquest (BradZax) referencing his silly soapboxing at a failed sarcastic attempt to invalidate a claim.

And the AI analysis was fun irony.