Somebody with wiki permissions...

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Wayward [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Genuinely, I'm not kidding, being sarcastic or facetious. Based on your lack of self-awareness and cognitive flexibility, and my understanding of autism, I can tell you are the level of autistic that requires support to function.

I take back mean things I've said, if that's the case.

I guess the real question is, why are you trolling someone you suspect of being autistic?

You plowed ahead with like 20+ spam posts.

You clearly don't care whether I am autistic or not. This just shows you willingly attacked someone you suspected of being autistic.

Disgusting.

And no, I am not autistic.

[Wayward]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And no, I am not autistic.

I'd get a second opinion on that if I were you.

[BradZax]

We all know that everyone thinks they have a disability these days wayward, but it might honestly just be you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Wayward [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd get a second opinion on that if I were you.

See? Literally continuing to attack someone you think is autistic.

Disgusting.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Wayward [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd get a second opinion on that if I were you.

You seem convinced that I am autistic. Please keep your word. Apologise, and stop spamming threads.

Originally Posted by Wayward [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I take back mean things I've said, if that's the case.

Originally Posted by Wayward [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the answer to either of these is yes, I will stop being mean to you.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What info on this version of the page is inaccurate?

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...gh_estimate.29

If something on that version is inaccurate we can remove it.

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wiki timeouts have been given out to the relevant parties, and the page has been reverted to what I think is (I'm not going to actually read every one of those edits) the most neutral and community-beneficial version.

Going forward, please, keep RnF in RnF (not in the wiki), and only edit the wiki with the goal of benefiting the entire community. I don't want to have to lock the page [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]



P.S. It's good to have a laptop again! Even if the screen is still broken, after well over a month in the shop (fuck you ubreakifix!)

The pseudo-code variation you created has some errors. That is another reason why I backed it out. If you are going to re-transcribe it, please actually take the time to do it right.

In the Archery section:

if Archery and mob is rooted or moving:
DamageDone = DamageDone / 2

This is incorrect, as the stationary conditional is Ranger only. This if statement as-is would run for every class.

It should read something like:

If Archery:
DamageDoneModifier = 2
If Archery and Ranger and Mob is not Rooted and Mob is not Moving:
DamageDoneModifier = 1

DamageDone = DamageDone / DamageDoneModifier

This is missing a > at the end of the random value, and you missed the maxExtra clamp completely:

ExtraPercent = 100 + (BaseBonus * <random value between 0.0 and 1.0)

It should be:

ExtraPercent = 100 + (BaseBonus * <random value between 0.0 and 1.0>)
If ExtraPercent > maxExtra:
ExtraPercent = maxExtra

Please make those changes. I will review it again when you are done.

[BradZax]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] DSM post calculator:

The \(N\)-Particle EquationFor a system of \(N\) particles (like an entire atom or molecule), the equation looks like this:

(The Second Summation)\(V_{ext}(\mathbf{r}_j, t)\): External forces acting on each particle (like a magnetic field).\(V_{int}(\mathbf{r}_j, \mathbf{r}_k)\): ,\dots ,\mathbf{r}_{N},t)=\left[\sum _{j=1}^{N}\left(-\frac{\hbar ^{2}}{2m_{j}}\nabla _{j}^{2}+V_{ext}(\mathbf{r}_{j},t)\right)+\sum _{j<k}^{N}V_{int}(\mathbf{r}_{j},\mathbf{r}_{k})\r ight]\Psi (\mathbf{r}_{1},\dots ,\mathbf{r}_{N},t)\)Breaking Down the Components1. The Energy Evolution (Left Side)\(i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\):

This represents the change in the system over time.

\(i\) is the imaginary unit and \(\hbar \) is the reduced Planck constant.2. The Kinetic Energy (The First Summation)\(\sum_{j=1}^N -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_j} \nabla_j^2\): This calculates the motion (kinetic energy) for every single particle in the system.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The \(\nabla ^{2}\) (Laplacian) operator accounts for movement in all three spatial dimensions (\(x, y, z\)).

R_μν = ∂_ρΓ^ρ_μν - ∂_νΓ^ρ_μρ + Γ^ρ_ρλΓ^λ_μν - Γ^ρ_μλΓ^λ_νρwhere:Γ^σ_μν = 1/2 g^σρ (∂_ν g_ρμ + ∂_μ g_ρν - ∂_ρ g_μν)G_μν + Λg_μν = (8πG/c^4) T_μν

3. The Potential Energy (The Second Summation)\(V_{ext}(\mathbf{r}_j, t)\): External forces acting on each particle (like a magnetic field).\(V_{int}(\mathbf{r}_j, \mathbf{r}_k)\):

This is what makes the equation truly "long" and complex. It accounts for the interactions between every pair of particles, such as the electrical repulsion between electrons.4.

The Wavefunction\(\Psi(\mathbf{r}_1, \dots, \mathbf{r}_N, t)\):

This is the "cloud" of probability for the entire system. Instead of tracking one position, it tracks the coordinates of all \(N\) particles simultaneously.

(The Second Summation)\(V_{ext}(\mathbf{r}_j, t)\): External forces acting on each particle (like a magnetic field).\(V_{int}(\mathbf{r}_j, \mathbf{r}_k)\):

(The Second Summation)\(V_{ext}(\mathbf{r}_j, t)\): External forces acting on each particle (like a magnetic field).\(V_{int}(\mathbf{r}_j, \mathbf{r}_k)\):

\(\sum_{j=1}^N -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_j} \nabla_j^2\): This calculates the motion (kinetic energy) for every single particle in the system. The \(\nabla ^{2}\) (Laplacian) operator accounts for movement in all three spatial dimensions (\(x, y, z\)).

\(\Psi(\mathbf{r}_1, \dots, \mathbf{r}_N, t)\): This is the "cloud" of probability for the entire system. Instead of tracking one position, it tracks the coordinates of all \(N\) particles simultaneously.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

R_μν = ∂_ρΓ^ρ_μν - ∂_νΓ^ρ_μρ + Γ^ρ_ρλΓ^λ_μν - Γ^ρ_μλΓ^λ_νρwhere:Γ^σ_μν = 1/2 g^σρ (∂_ν g_ρμ + ∂_μ g_ρν - ∂_ρ g_μν)G_μν + Λg_μν = (8πG/c^4) T_μν

iℏ ∂/∂t Ψ(r₁, r₂, ..., rₙ, t) = [ Σᵢ₌₁ⁿ (-ℏ²/2mᵢ) ∇ᵢ² + Σᵢ<ⱼ V(rᵢ, rⱼ) + Σᵢ V_ext(rᵢ) ] Ψ(r₁, r₂, ..., rₙ, t)

The \(\nabla ^{2}\) (Laplacian) operator accounts for movement in all three spatial dimensions (\(x, y, z\)).

[Defo]

Originally Posted by BradZax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] DSM post calculator:

I know these functions well! Haha. Glad to see some physics equations make it to Forums

[loramin]

DSM I say this as someone who is probably on the spectrum myself (I've never been diagnosed, but my sister has) ...

... there is absolutely zero doubt, in my mind or in any regular forum reader's mind, that you are on the spectrum. ZERO doubt.

It's not a flame, and not an insult (I'd be insulting myself) ... but it's a fact that resources are available for people like us. If you struggle in real life with social awareness as much as you do in the forum, you really might want to consider taking a test, so you can benefit from those resources.

[Ephirith]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The pseudo-code variation you created has some errors. That is another reason why I backed it out. If you are going to re-transcribe it, please actually take the time to do it right.

In the Archery section:



This is incorrect, as the stationary conditional is Ranger only. This if statement as-is would run for every class.

It should read something like:



This is missing a > at the end of the random value, and you missed the maxExtra clamp completely:


It should be:



Please make those changes. I will review it again when you are done.

DSM hopefully in the process of learning a valuable social skill: you can be correct, and still lose and end up banned from the wiki