Too much to ask for a character face change?

[roguep1999]

Maybe they should offer face / name change for donation

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It makes a sick rear view mirror, which may sound unclassic, but this used to be a feature of the inventory window. As the inventory mirror is currently missing, it seems fair to have an alternative implementation elsewhere.

Since I started a little bit later in the classic era, I had no idea what you were talking about, but then I saw this and remembered it from watching my friend play (although I don't remember him ever using it as a "rearview mirror"):

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SHIFT+T is obviously way better, but seeing it as unclassic replacement for a classic feature makes way more sense than seeing it as Nilbog choosing unclassic easy mode.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Since I started a little bit later in the classic era, I had no idea what you were talking about, but then I saw this and remembered it from watching my friend play (although I don't remember him ever using it as a "rearview mirror"):

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SHIFT+T is obviously way better, but seeing it as unclassic replacement for a classic feature makes way more sense than seeing it as Nilbog choosing unclassic easy mode.

If you pressed the inventory button on the top right the worn item slots would disappear giving decent forward view while keeping the rearview mirror open. Very nice.

[Xer0]

Originally Posted by Skarne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Alas! Not classic!

Honestly this is no longer a valid response to simple changes that don't effect gameplay. Don't get me wrong, I am ALL FOR patching out clearly unintended mechanics that are exploited by the userbase to provide an undeserved advantage. But since they're openly stating they're now making changes to preserve the "spirit" of classic (I know this is not the first "unclassic" implementation-- just the first time I saw one in the patchnotes that didn't have a real reason behind it) and not just implementing what *is* classic? "shit's classic"/ "not classic" means nothing.

[Skarne]

Originally Posted by Xer0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Honestly this is no longer a valid response to simple changes that don't effect gameplay. Don't get me wrong, I am ALL FOR patching out clearly unintended mechanics that are exploited by the userbase to provide an undeserved advantage. But since they're openly stating they're now making changes to preserve the "spirit" of classic (I know this is not the first "unclassic" implementation-- just the first time I saw one in the patchnotes that didn't have a real reason behind it) and not just implementing what *is* classic? "shit's classic"/ "not classic" means nothing.

Take it to da devs!