![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
![]() I took another look at Zuranthium's evidence he posted:
http://web.archive.org/web/200107211...23&t=000082&p= This was posted on Sept 8, 2000, which was before the Twig Nerf. That was Sept 19, 2000: http://www.tski.co.jp/baldio/patch/20000919.html The poster is a 46 Warrior, with a damage bonus of 7. That is the same damage bonus as P99/EQEMU code for a level 46. The pattern of most hits showing up at (9 * 2) + 7 = 25 is also what P99/EQEMU code does. This is because there is a chance to only use the Weapon Damage * (D20 Roll / 10) damage value. You do not always apply the percentage roll that can adjust your damage to be higher than Weapon Damage * 2. If the damage bonus or damage formula was different from P99/EQEMU while Twig was available, it wasn't different a week before the nerf. You'd have to show a point in time where the damage bonus and/or formula was different from P99/EQEMU code while twig was not nerfed.
__________________
| ||
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 07-16-2025 at 10:03 PM..
|
![]() |
|
|