Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
Serverwide PvP Messages(including players, their locations) 105 66.46%
Zonewide PvP Messages(including players) 17 10.76%
No PvP Messages 34 21.52%
Other(explain in thread) 2 1.27%
Voters: 158. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:04 PM
Pudge Pudge is offline
Planar Protector

Pudge's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juicedsixfo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about if two guilds /guildwar eachother, yellow text can be enabled.
this please. plsplspls. such a good idea. full YT if guilds /guildwar! names/location included

in addition to the "big battle" text.
  #32  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:13 PM
Extunarian Extunarian is offline
Planar Protector

Extunarian's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 1,186
Default

I voted no at first but I would be all for the guildwar/big battle YT. If the population is decent I'm just not gonna give a crap about random guy 1 killing random guy 2.
__________________
Jorg Shaman
  #33  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:15 PM
Vile Vile is offline
Planar Protector

Vile's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,305
Default

How about if over X, let's say 6 for now -- a full group, of guild A & B are in 1 zone it enables the YT?
  #34  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:25 PM
juicedsixfo juicedsixfo is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 474
Default

That seems like it could get complicated, but who knows. I'm against yellow text for a handful of reasons, but I would support a mass /guildwar enabling yellow text. Maybe just up the duration of /guildwar to a week instead of a day.


I heard the guildwar command acts funny on Emu servers, but it ~seems~ possible to make a command for announcing kills through it.
  #35  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:41 PM
Guybrush Guybrush is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SearyxTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Imagine if you stopped roleplaying and a giant ogre in multicolored armor with a skeleton pal harm touched ur fucking face and a yellow text broadcast from the Sleeper (or some other lore bullshit) announced your untimely demise
The sleeper is far too busy sleeping to make announcements about people being murdered. Did you even TRY to make a plausible Roleplay scenario???
  #36  
Old 08-25-2011, 06:37 PM
Scribbles Scribbles is offline
Sarnak

Scribbles's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 325
Default

i think YT as it was on vztz should be in- pvp with no item loot/lb is all about reputation and seeing who is killing who is the main way those come about


edit- maybe a feature on the website that would list all kills, so it wouldnt be in the ingame chat but oyu could still see?
  #37  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:34 PM
Cwall Cwall is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the reasoning for the broadcasts is to promote pvp awareness and not ego stroking then why not have a system in place that broadcasts big pvp battles. If several deaths occur in the same zone it could mention that there has/is a battle occurring in the zone with x players involved. Possibly mention guild names if it's a definitive guild vs guild.

Just trying to come up with ideas as a compromise.
I think this idea is pretty cool. Maybe zonewide yellow text to keep track of killshots and then when a certain number of deaths happen within a certain time frame, it announces to the server that x zone is a battlefield or something.
  #38  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:52 PM
Lasher Lasher is offline
Fire Giant

Lasher's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 953
Default

have the KDR recorded privatly and if a person with a low KDR gets killed it doesnt broadcast but ifs someone with a high one gets killed it broadcasts
  #39  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:58 PM
Tombom Tombom is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,083
Default

I just don't see why it is such a big deal to make global ooc/YT ignorable and move on with it. The people who don't want to deal with it won't have to, but people who feel it keeps the server feeling livley and active can enjoy it, there is really no downside.
  #40  
Old 08-25-2011, 11:05 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

The down side has been expounded on relentlessly because people that talk about wanting an active pvp server want to pvp less to establish their names.

VZ/TZ never had more than 150 people on it. It was barely over 300 chars for a short duration, and we all know now that prolly a third of that was Brainz. Seriously tho, with all the 3 and 4 box'ing that was happening, its pretty safe to say never over 150 people logged in.

I'm all about global OOC until the pop is over 250 or so, maybe 150.

But YT is just annoying. Its kinda cool for a bit as a novelty, but it really has no benefit besides the clowns that think it makes them cool.

They just dont want to have to earn their reps the hard way, by actually killing relentlessly.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.