Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[Stryker85]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's already been proven as factually incorrect. You need to let go as well.

Wtf? No it hasn't. The VAST majority of the people that have posted in this thread have agreed that it most certainly is a solo kill, even if some think that adding an additional rank for unbuffed kills would be acceptable as well.

If you think otherwise, why don't you go make a poll in the Blue General or UN Blue discord channels and see what the vast majority of the EQ population thinks? I won't hold my breath.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Stryker85 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wtf? No it hasn't. The VAST majority of the people that have posted in this thread have agreed that it most certainly is a solo kill, even if some think that adding an additional rank for unbuffed kills would be acceptable as well.

If you think otherwise, why don't you go make a poll in the Blue General or UN Blue discord channels and see what the vast majority of the EQ population thinks? I won't hold my breath.

You're delusional. Here are some people that posted today that support changes:

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it’s laughable that the condition should still exist that it’s ok to not buff casters but melee can be buffed while still competing against the same mobs. This should absolutely be changed

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

An SAC category of only self-buffed is also a reasonable category.

Originally Posted by Goregasmic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

in a vacuum, there's a hierarchy of kills and unbuffed ranks higher.

[Stryker85]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're delusional. Here are some people that posted today that support changes:

LOL you're not fooling anybody by taking one sentence out of context from these posts. You're such a disingenuous piece of shit, you're just cherry picking parts of their posts without including the most relevant lines.

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stryker's kill is obviously a solo kill and obviously impressive. An accomplishment to be proud of.

I've read the thread, and you (DSM) haven't exactly covered yourself in glory in this thread either. This thread would be a lot better if you didn't spend 50 pages going back and forth with those two idiots. All that it accomplished was to detract and distract from an impressive accomplishment by Stryker.

What have you got to say about that, Samoht?? I thought this was someone that supported your argument? But here they are saying the exact opposite, and he's actually pointing out what an IDIOT you are.

Would you like me to make a post like this for every person here that's disagreed with your dumbass logic? I can certainly promise you its a whole hell of a lot more than the 2 other people that are trolling this thread with you.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Stryker85 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wtf? No it hasn't. The VAST majority of the people that have posted in this thread have agreed that it most certainly is a solo kill, even if some think that adding an additional rank for unbuffed kills would be acceptable as well.

It is clearly a solo kill, a very impressive one, and I think everyone except for two people agree on that.

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're delusional. Here are some people that posted today that support changes:

This is the second time you've quoted me as if I support your position so I want to state very clearly I do not.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is the second time you've quoted me as if I support your position so I want to state very clearly I do not.

It is not a misquote. Did you make the post in error?

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is not a misquote. Did you make the post in error?

I think there should be a SAC category for unbuffed solo kills. You've said a bunch of other stupid shit in this thread, I'm not going to try to summarize it all or go back and re-read it all, but you quoted me out of context and I would appreciate if you do not try to mischaracterize me as supporting anything you said in the past or say in the future.

You're clearly trying to downplay and denigrate Stryker's impressive achievement and I want nothing to do with that.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're clearly trying to downplay and denigrate Stryker's achievement and I want nothing to do with that.

This is correct.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think there should be a SAC category for unbuffed solo kills.

I think we're in agreement. Thank you for confirming.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think we're in agreement. Thank you for confirming.

There is not common agreement about a separate SAC category, at least in it's implementation and intent.

But there is something we can all agree on, which is good:

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're [Samoht] clearly trying to downplay and denigrate Stryker's achievement and I want nothing to do with that.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think we're in agreement. Thank you for confirming.

Glad to hear you agree it was an impressive solo kill, under restrictions that are as hard for a monk to do as possible.