Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I do more than you.

You've continued to ignore the facts of how the game is played and how solo success is measured by a variety of viewpoints, including by the poster of this very thread.

You are lying about me again. Your opinion that you are a better speaker for the community is just that: An opinion.

People can watch OP's videos and my own videos. They can read your posts since you don't have any videos, and they can decide who is more credible.

Use your new page and show us how it's done!

https://wiki.project1999.com/Zuranth...tist_challenge

Back to the topic.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reposting OP's epic video where he kills Fungi King solo with his monk, no consumables:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wONdIYAofyQ

https://wiki.project1999.com/Solo_Artist_Challenge

It deserves the highest ranking of [S] when following the solo artist challenge wiki page.

[Zuranthium]

Oh but I do have videos. Completing solo challenge with zero consumables and no outside buffs - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqNfDrTpG_Q. Can view several more on the channel, and plenty of other channels.

So there is one tier of solo challenge (the highest tier). 3 other tiers have been shown in this thread, the 3 different ways the OP killed Fungi King. And then in terms of doing something without any outside pull assistance, using Puppet Strings could also be considered another separate tier (the lowest tier).

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your opinion that you are a better speaker for the community is just that: An opinion.

Nope. It's a fact that the community has expressed, in this thread alone, a more complex range of opinions than had been reflected on the outdated wiki page, and a more complex range than your bury-head-in-the-sand way of thinking, where you continue to act like a flat earther or evolution denier, refusing to acknowledge proof and reasoning.

And it's a fact that the updated tiers are the exact different ways people have approached playing the game. These tiers are inarguably more reflective and accurate, which is the entire point of the wiki.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh but I do have videos. Completing solo challenge with zero consumables and no outside buffs - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqNfDrTpG_Q. Can view several more on the channel, and plenty of other channels.

I stand corrected! Looks like you can make videos. You should make videos for some of the claims you have made in the past, like the offhand swapping on your Ranger. You talk way more than you show, while claiming whatever you are talking about is easy.

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope. It's a fact that the community has expressed, in this thread alone, a more complex range of opinions than had been reflected on the outdated wiki page, and a more complex range than your bury-head-in-the-sand way of thinking, where you continue to act like a flat earther or evolution denier, refusing to acknowledge proof and reasoning.

I disagree, and continuing to lie about me just makes you look bad. Yourself and Samoht is not the community. I am not sure why you are claiming OP agrees with you. I also disagree with your current approach to changing the wiki.

You don't seem to realize that there is a hall of fame for the solo challenge wiki page. One reason why it probably hasn't changed much over the years is out of respect for those players. Everyone's achievements are now incorrect because their rank does not reflect the challenge anymore.

Editing the wiki when you are trying to win a debate is kind of a jerk move for the hall of fame players. Stick to your own page and try to win people over to your side, instead of simply claiming everybody agrees with you, without evidence.

https://wiki.project1999.com/Zuranth...tist_challenge

The wiki is big enough for both pages, there is no reason for you to be against having your own page.

[Zuranthium]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am not sure why you are claiming OP agrees with you.

They found it more valuable to complete a solo challenge without C-heal clicky and then without any consumables at all. They also argued that it's more special without Puppet Strings. That is the exact definition of tiers.

A great many people have expressed the same thing, and factually played the game in greater variety of ways than previously listed. You're literally the only person trying to say that a bad, outdated wiki page should never be updated. Stop trying to stupidly act like everyone should blindly agree with something ONE other person wrote over a decade ago, when even at that time people were saying the tiers weren't accurate enough, and when the initial post itself literally says the rules will need to be updated!

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

there is a hall of fame for the solo challenge wiki page. One reason why it probably hasn't changed much over the years is out of respect for those players. Everyone's achievements are now incorrect because their rank does not reflect the challenge anymore.

That page is very out of date and doesn't reflect tons of people who should be on it. The old ranks can be written on that old page, not that anyone cares. The ranks aren't even used for the majority there, only for a handful of individual kills, and the classes used aren't even listed in those instances.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stick to your own page

Nobody has "their own page" in this matter. It's a community page, meant to reflect the way people play the game and what people find valuable. I am not interested in creating my own challenge page and I do not agree with the placing of many of the current listed MOBs. Stop trying to edit the wiki with wrong info.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nobody has "their own page" in this matter. It's a community page, meant to reflect the way people play the game and what people find valuable. I am not interested in creating my own challenge page and I do not agree with the placing of many of the current listed MOBs. Stop trying to edit the wiki with wrong info.

Plenty of people have their own pages. Check the guides section. I have my own guide, the link is in my signature. Use your own guide instead of trying to force your changes on the community page that breaks the hall of fame page.

https://wiki.project1999.com/Zuranth...tist_challenge

I never edited the wiki with wrong info. Seriously stop lying. I am just undoing edits by yourself and samoht that are done without thinking to win an argument. You aren't being respectful at all.

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That page is very out of date and doesn't reflect tons of people who should be on it. The old ranks can be written on that old page, not that anyone cares. The ranks aren't even used for the majority there, only for a handful of individual kills, and the classes used aren't even listed in those instances.

Yikes.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Back on topic:

Reposting OP's epic video where he kills Fungi King solo with his monk, no consumables:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wONdIYAofyQ

https://wiki.project1999.com/Solo_Artist_Challenge

It deserves the highest ranking of [S] when following the solo artist challenge wiki page.

[Zuranthium]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You aren't being respectful at all.

Indeed you aren't. Once again, NOBODY agrees with you that there are only two ways of playing EQ and doing challenges. Nor that a wiki page should be kept outdated. A wiki page that specifically says it needs to be updated, that the community already wanted updated over a decade ago.

Stop trying to alter a community page to something that does not reflect the community.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never edited the wiki with wrong info.

Yes you did. You are trying to put my name on an article that does not reflect my opinions and attempting to say that others don't recognize the existence of more tiers. Both false.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Indeed you aren't. Once again, NOBODY agrees with you that there are only two ways of playing EQ and doing challenges. Nor that a wiki page should be kept outdated. A wiki page that specifically says it needs to be updated, that the community already wanted updated over a decade ago.

Stop trying to alter a community page to something that does not reflect the community.

You are just lying about my position again. I never said there are only two ways to play or do challenges. Nor did I say the wiki page can never be edited. You and Samoht are the only ones here actually editing the community page. I am just undoing your changes while you are editing the wiki to win an argument, rather than trying to actually trying to improve it.

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes you did. You are trying to put my name on an article that does not reflect my opinions and attempting to say that others don't recognize the existence of more tiers. Both false.

I literally just copied the solo artist challenge page with your edits. Are you saying your own edits... do not reflect your opinions? This is absurd lol.

https://wiki.project1999.com/Zuranth...tist_challenge