Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2025, 06:16 PM
azxten azxten is offline
Fire Giant

azxten's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah IMO this is the thing that makes people think Enchanter charming isn't classic as a whole. The other mechanics are fine. It's that on live channeling was much harder and so if you were trying to cast while getting hit it was basically a total tossup on whether you'd survive (unless you were in the top end of the level range IIRC). A root break on top of a charm break? Forget about it.
This moron spent years stalking me on forums here whenever I pointed out that Enchanter was OP due to channeling.



























Hilarious.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2025, 12:44 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azxten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This moron spent years stalking me on forums here whenever I pointed out that Enchanter was OP due to channeling.



























Hilarious.
?

Literally like every time you went on some long-winded, whiny rant about Enchanters being non-classic in every way, I said the only thing we know is non-classic is channeling
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2025, 12:11 AM
Reiwa Reiwa is offline
Planar Protector

Reiwa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,972
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
?

Literally like every time you went on some long-winded, whiny rant about Enchanters being non-classic in every way, I said the only thing we know is non-classic is channeling
What else did he say was non-Classic?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-2025, 11:53 AM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What else did he say was non-Classic?
It's been awhile (fortunately) since he posted his rants, but at one point in time IIRC he was essentially asserting that the entirety of the mechanics must be unclassic (Charm lasts too long, CHA has too much of an impact, etc.) without providing direct evidence to support it outside of anecdotal claims (such as well people didn't charm kill extensively in 1999 so it must be unclassic on here).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2025, 12:36 PM
Reiwa Reiwa is offline
Planar Protector

Reiwa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,972
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's been awhile (fortunately) since he posted his rants, but at one point in time IIRC he was essentially asserting that the entirety of the mechanics must be unclassic (Charm lasts too long, CHA has too much of an impact, etc.) without providing direct evidence to support it outside of anecdotal claims (such as well people didn't charm kill extensively in 1999 so it must be unclassic on here).
Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
CHA has too much of an impact
I'm under the impression Torven or another TAKP affiliate proved that one true with an era-client decompile.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.