Quote:
Originally Posted by Crede
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think Ranger lack of tankiness is fine. They’re glass cannons. Where they got it completely wrong is how much dps monks do. Monks should be lower than bard dps. Take that away and I think there’s more of a reason to be a ranger being a high dps class with utility.
|
Rangers have more HP than other DPS and they get the Taunt skill which communicates that they were designed to be a decent option to tank in the absence of a warrior or a knight. They're definitely not a cannon either, just glass with mediocre damage.
Also why should bards be better DPS than monks? Monks were busted because of how good their avoidance was but they're a pure melee without any of the utility a Bard has. They should be decent off tanks and good DPS to compensate for their lack of options.