Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Tanks

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2024, 12:37 PM
Nickelback8469 Nickelback8469 is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Oct 2024
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think Ranger lack of tankiness is fine. They’re glass cannons. Where they got it completely wrong is how much dps monks do. Monks should be lower than bard dps. Take that away and I think there’s more of a reason to be a ranger being a high dps class with utility.
Rangers have more HP than other DPS and they get the Taunt skill which communicates that they were designed to be a decent option to tank in the absence of a warrior or a knight. They're definitely not a cannon either, just glass with mediocre damage.

Also why should bards be better DPS than monks? Monks were busted because of how good their avoidance was but they're a pure melee without any of the utility a Bard has. They should be decent off tanks and good DPS to compensate for their lack of options.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.