monk ratios, primary and offhand choices

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're assuming Eisai is talking about you in that last quote, but I do not share that assumption.

You are free to assume whatever you want. If you actually agree that tbe party with the superior data is the victor in a debate, it is quite clear you do not apply this standard to Troxx. He provides zero data.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For reference, I parsed my best 1h and 2h weapons on my SK:

https://youtu.be/P5ouLQOBAoE - Frostwrath

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist

I am using https://wiki.project1999.com/Frostwrath for the weapon. I have 34% worn haste.

This is an interesting video. It shows that RNG can be a fickle mistress.

Test 01 - At 231 STR, I did 39167 damage over 603 seconds = 64.9 DPS (no ripostes)
Test 02 - At 210 STR, I did 38969 damage over 595 seconds = 65.4 DPS (no ripostes)
DPS difference = -0.5 DPS

A 600-second test that shows a negative impact from more strength. What conclusions can we make of this?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A 600-second test that shows a negative impact from more strength. What conclusions can we make of this?

I find it amusing Bcbrown is trying to pretend data and parsing is less accurate than a person randomly saying "I am right about X. You must trust me, and any request for data is not worth my time."

This is his worst argument yet. He would rather do this than answer the question why he never holds Troxx accountable for anything he says.

Bcbrown and Troxx could show me how it's done by providing better data at any time. They never do. They clearly can't.

To answer your question, it shows that 20 STR isn't increasing your DPS by large amounts. If 1 STR = 5 DPS, you'd see that massive increase. My DPS would go from 65 to well over 100. The fact that 20 STR gives fairly small DPS gains is why it can be hidden by variance.

[Jimjam]

I’m interested by this 15dmg is a min hit of 2 (presumably in offhand). Is this something only applying to monks with their improved damage tables?

Under what circumstances is this true? I know at low skill (offence?) and strength, hits are between double dmg and a twentieth of double damage. Is this the scenario we discuss? 15dmg*2/20

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cotterpin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yet another DSM meltdown thread

who would've thought

There are no "DSM meltdown threads". The alternate reality people live in when reading these threads is a strange one.

Its just another Troxx thread. He did melt down spectacularly in this thread:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=268.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=269

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can beg me for my parses all you want. You can go get your own damn parses for all I care. Whether I post my parses or not ... whether you shit on them or not ... whether you care to believe them or whatever the heck you are inclined to believe ...none of it changes in game *reality*. Those with the tools and the experience know the truth.

He admitted to being closeminded, and will never accept other people's data, because he lives in his own *reality*. He never admits to being wrong, so this was assumed already. But him admitting it removes any doubt.

I am a bit worried about him to be honest. He thinks he has a repuation for being the guy everybody goes to for data. He thinks people literally beg him for data. But he hasn't provided any data for two years. He has utterly trashed whatever reputation he thought he had through his actions over the last two years, but he still clings to it.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I’m interested by this 15dmg is a min hit of 2 (presumably in offhand). Is this something only applying to monks with their improved damage tables?

Under what circumstances is this true? I know at low skill (offence?) and strength, hits are between double dmg and a twentieth of double damage. Is this the scenario we discuss? 15dmg*2/20

There does appear to be a minimum damage for melee classes besides the damage bonus for your primary hand in some cases. As a simple example, on my SK my Fire Etched Ancient Flamberge never hits for less than 46 damage. According to the damage table:

https://lucy.allakhazam.com/dmgbonus.html

My 44 delay weapon should have a 34 damage bonus at level 59. So I am getting an extra 11 damage from something. In the Monk parse I provided in this thread, offhand can hit for 1 damage, so this doesn't affect offhand. My 60 Shaman still hits for 1, so this extra damage only affects melee.

In the same Monk parse from this thread, my primary weapon hit for a minimum of 10 damage, which does match the table (9 damage bonus at level 52 + 1 damage from a minimally rolled damage roll).

Either P99 uses a custom damage table for some delays, or melee classes get an increase to their minimum damage roll in some cases for their primary hand.

[Jimjam]

There is a thread where Rogean posts the formula for damage bonus on p99 including era/pvp server toggles iirc.

[Troxx]

lol @ DSM feeling the need to be worried about me?

I truly do inhabit the sands of your vagina don’t I? Thanks for letting me live rent free in that autistic head of yours [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But yes, you are welcome to beg me for parses. I’ll provide them freely to anyone else. I enjoy doing/watching them and understanding the game.

For you? I’m happy to charge you the same hourly rate I make 40hrs a week. I did that once for you pro bono - it was a waste of time. I’ve already linked the thread and most of the people in this thread read along with that other thread for the nearly 2.5 years it drug on. So yep, if you want me to actively parse or spend time sifting through old logs, feel free to Venmo me $150 for a deposit for the first hour. Hourly rates apply following.

No more freebies.

Thank you for the ongoing entertainment DSM. You make my work days a lot less boring.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol @ DSM feeling the need to be worried about me?

I truly do inhabit the sands of your vagina don’t I? Thanks for letting me live rent free in that autistic head of yours [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But yes, you are welcome to beg me for parses. I’ll provide them freely to anyone else. I enjoy doing/watching them and understanding the game.

For you? I’m happy to charge you the same hourly rate I make 40hrs a week. I did that once for you pro bono - it was a waste of time. I’ve already linked the thread and most of the people in this thread read along with that other thread for the nearly 2.5 years it drug on. So yep, if you want me to actively parse or spend time sifting through old logs, feel free to Venmo me $150 for a deposit for the first hour. Hourly rates apply following.

No more freebies.

Thank you for the ongoing entertainment DSM. You make my work days a lot less boring.

I feel sorry for Troxx. He is projecting all of his problems on to me.

He pretends that he is simply denying me parses specifically, but he hasn't supplied parses for anyone in the past 2 years on any topic. It's just a silly excuse to stroke his ego.

He seems to think there are tons of people asking him for his parses and data. But you can't find any evidence of this.

His reputation for being the data guy has long since been destroyed after 1000+ posts of trolling, insults, etc., and zero parses or data over the past two years.

I urge you to take a look at reality, and not your delusional *reality* you currently live in.

Troxx has yet again admitted to purposely obfuscating information for the sake of trolling specific posters. This is just sad and pathetic behavior that hurts the community. It doesn't hurt me, it hurts the other people reading these threads. I don't know why he is so gleefully destructive in his actions.

I will never understand his logic. He thinks that making an ass of himself publicly, and publicly proclaiming he will never give out data to back up his baseless claims without a real money fee is... hurting me specifically? Does he think this makes him look good somehow?

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Example of DSM math:

DSM: Did you know that Usain Bolt can run 100 meters in approximately ten seconds?
Non-autist: Cool.
DSM: By my calculations that means Usain Bolt can run from New York to Los Angeles in just 5.2 days.
Non-autist: No man, that's not how that works.
DSM: Clearly you just don't understand math.