Player Agreement: Rule Change at the DS Camp

[Otsego]

Originally Posted by berbax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Otsego, it’s disappointing to see you twist the situation like this.

No twisting. Just the reality.

You not just asking people to come to the thread and give their input.

You're asking people to come to the thread to support you, giving reason that CSR has sent you into a losing battle to garner sympathy. You then ask directly for positive support for your side.

You say you don't want bias, but you only point out flaws in the no votes and you only ask people to come to vote yes.

Are you blind to your own biases?

[berbax]

Originally Posted by Otsego [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No twisting. Just the reality.

You aren't asking people to come to the thread and give their input.

You're asking people to come to the thread to support you, giving reason that CSR has sent you into a losing battle to garner sympathy. You then ask directly for positive support for your side.

You say you don't want bias, but you only point out flaws in the no votes and you only ask people to come to vote yes.

Are you blind to your own biases?

Unfortunately wrong again, here are all my posts, which also follows the same form of advocacy and awareness as the message I sent you:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Otsego]

Originally Posted by berbax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Unfortunately wrong again, here are all my posts, which also follows the same form of advocacy and awareness as the message I sent you:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't know you were making posts in Discords about this also, but I am talking about the private 1:1 tells you are sending out.

You know.. the things not in the public eye where your "unbiased" image matters.

[berbax]

Originally Posted by Otsego [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't know you were making posts in Discords about this also, but I am talking about the private 1:1 tells you are sending out.

You know.. the things not in the public eye where your "unbiased" image matters.

It’s a bit of a stretch to suggest that one tell equates to some secretive, manipulative campaign. I sent you a single message because I thought your group might be interested in the discussion, nothing more. If you want to spin that into a conspiracy theory, that’s on you, but it doesn’t align with the reality of the situation. For the remainder of this thread’s lifespan, I’m unlikely to engage in any more conspiracy theories.