Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Snaggles]

For sake of my sanity, to clarifying are you arguing shaman > cleric?
I started in trying to justify a sham for the 4th fill. Not the 3rd let alone as a trio.

Cleric is stronger with two charm classes than slow already. It’s the benefit they get for otherwise being horribly boring.

If this was two monks, sure, shaman all day long.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For sake of my sanity, to clarifying are you arguing shaman > cleric?.

Yes. He is. There is no sanity when it comes to DSM. He’s got such a massive boner for shamans that there isn’t any blood flow left to go to his brain.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For sake of my sanity, to clarifying are you arguing shaman > cleric?
I started in trying to justify a sham for the 4th fill. Not the 3rd let alone as a trio.

Cleric is stronger with two charm classes than slow already. It’s the benefit they get for otherwise being horribly boring.

If this was two monks, sure, shaman all day long.

Both Shamans and Clerics work well with Enchanters, as both parties have explained in detail. That is why I said Shaman/Cleric/Enchanter/Enchanter on the first page.

In the scenario where you can only pick one, the Shaman is a better choice, because making a level 49 pocket cleric to handle the occasional res and pet CH is easier and faster than making a level 60 Torpor Shaman for something like Vaniki or West Waste Dragons.

Now, I am not sure why people keep saying pocket clerics are not allowed. OP didn't say you can't use them, and they are a common practice on P99. If the idea is you can only use the four main characters and no other character, this would mean you can't use mules either. People are not going to stop using Pocket Clerics or Mules because of this thread.