Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://kea-learning.nz/warfighting-...effectiveness/

Hell yeah brother!

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Holy crap, I was killed by a wall of text

You're not missing anything in that wall of text either. The only relevant point Bcbrown made was that he agreed Troxx has trolled, flamed, and shitposted. He tried to obfuscate this as much as possible via text wall, but I consider it progress. People are slowly seeing reality.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am disappointed. In the end Bcbrown wrote a lot, which I read, and dodged the question on Troxx almost completely.

Nah. He answered you. You asked him what his definition of a troll was. He gave it to you quite brilliantly. Then he answered.

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So now we can approach your question. Is Troxx a troll? Well, I reject the premise, as I wrote above. Has Troxx trolled? Well, he once said he's engaged in that sort of behavior in the past, and I take him at his word. In this thread, though? He's certainly done some flaming, and you've both engaged in shitposting in the form of repetitive no-information posts.

Bcbrown that was a wonderful read. I did enjoy your example regarding smoking, the is vs is not and the noun vs verb. Unfortunately I don’t know that DSM has the requisite number of functioning neurons to comprehend that totality of your response.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nah. He answered you. You asked him what his definition of a troll was. He gave it to you quite brilliantly. Then he answered.



Bcbrown that was a wonderful read. I did enjoy your example regarding smoking, the is vs is not and the noun vs verb. Unfortunately I don’t know that DSM has the requisite number of functioning neurons to comprehend that totality of your response.

He did admit you were trolling, flaming, and shitposting, so the question was answered in that sense. Remember I asked him if you were a troll or not.He just encapsulated that admission in a wall of text to obfuscate this point as much as possible.

And yes, it is clear you would agree with him, as he used your definition of trolling. It is a silly definition you are using to walk back your admission of trolling. Bcbrown's bias also shows when he simply takes your definition of trolling wholecloth.

https://www.esafety.gov.au/young-peo...0cause%20drama

Here is a better definition of trolling:

Trolling is when someone posts or comments online to ‘bait’ people, which means deliberately provoking an argument or emotional reaction. In some cases they say things they don’t even believe, just to cause drama. In other cases, they may not agree with the views of another person or group online, so they try to discredit, humiliate or punish them. This may include online hate – personal attacks that target someone because of their race, culture, religion, gender, sexual orientation or disability. The troll may also encourage mob mentality, urging others to join in the attack so it becomes a pile on

This describes your behavior perfectly, including attacking autistic people lol.

[eqravenprince]

Simple definition of a troll - a person trying to provoke and upset others online for their own amusement. A whole lot of people guilty of this and didn't need a wall of text to do it. But I find it amusing, so I guess that makes me a troll if this post provoked or upset someone.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Simple definition of a troll - a person trying to provoke and upset others online for their own amusement. A whole lot of people guilty of this and didn't need a wall of text to do it. But I find it amusing, so I guess that makes me a troll if this post provoked or upset someone.

Agreed on the simple definition, but no, you aren't a troll. As far as I can tell that is not your intent.

[Troxx]

Sorry you didn’t get the answer out of him you wanted.

Can we get back to the topic at hand? You have not made a compelling case why, given the choice between a shaman and a cleric, the a group of 3 casters (2 of which at least will be charming) would choose the shaman.

We are aware of what shamans can do - to include measures to protect the casters on charm breaks. I would like for you to explain why you think that would be preferable to a 1 second targeted aoe stun (or a single target stun - both of which will be on the competent cleric’s casting bar in this group) followed by superior blast heals.

Let’s get back on topic. We would appreciate less off-topic shit posting from you.

Discuss.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry you didn’t get the answer out of him you wanted.

Can we get back to the topic at hand? You have not made a compelling case why, given the choice between a shaman and a cleric, the a group of 3 casters (2 of which at least will be charming) would choose the shaman.

We are aware of what shamans can do - to include measures to protect the casters on charm breaks. I would like for you to explain why you think that would be preferable to a 1 second targeted aoe stun (or a single target stun - both of which will be on the competent cleric’s casting bar in this group) followed by superior blast heals.

Let’s get back on topic. We would appreciate less off-topic shit posting from you.

Discuss.

Lol it is amazing you are accusing me of going off topic and shit posting. You are always the one who starts this. Check the post history. If you don't attack me, I don't defend myself. I never start this. You have the power to stop the nonsense, as you are the cause. Even Bcbrown admits you troll, shit post, and flame.

Remember randomly posting off topic nonsense in a thread that was dead for 6 months yesterday?

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=163

Let's get back on topic indeed.

If you can agree to control yourself, we can discuss the matter normally. I won't continue the discussion without this agreement from you. No attacks in your agreement post either please.

[Trexller]

who else thinks DSM and Troxx should just fuck already?

[Troxx]

Remember randomly posting off topic nonsense in a thread that was dead for 6 months yesterday?

Are you referring to the thread that you have been quoting and have linked somewhere between 30-50 times in the last week or so? As far as I’m concerned if you want to keep referencing that entire discussion… it’s fair game for everyone to read and laugh about.

Stop accusing people of trolling any time they disagree with you. For the love of god, quit thanking people for concessions they never made.

Stop shit posting and get back on topic.

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

who else thinks DSM and Troxx should just fuck already?

I’m two steps ahead of you. Check my location.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]