Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Swish]

A-Team could do it.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still waiting.

Name one camp. Do it or just admit that you were lying so we can move on.

Troxx can't read the thread, as the answer is already there. Simply asking people to repeat themselves isn't helping you. It just makes you look desparate. Here is the latest repetiton for reference, so hopefully you can read it https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4802 .

He'll just keep asking this even though the answer was given multiple times. He does this because he is afraid to answer questions, provide evidence, rebut points, or admit he is wrong like a normal adult.

He cannot rebut these points:

https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4808

He cannot explain what a pocket character is.

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's no "allowed" or "not allowed". You're free to bring up pocket characters.

Precisely. There is no reason to argue against them, as they are allowed, and a normal part of P99. I don't see anybody arguing that people shouldn't use mules.

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If there's two different group compositions, and neither is "necessary", the composition that doesn't rely upon pocket characters is better, in my opinion.

Neither group composition relies on pocket characters, just like neither group relies on mules. Both are things that people commonly use on P99 for convenience. Stating the obvious about how P99 works shouldn't be this contentious.

[Troxx]

You’re still not doing that thing you said you could do. You stated you could name multiple camps that need a shaman.

Name one.

Just one.

I’m super curious here.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You’re still not doing that thing you said you could do. You stated you could name multiple camps that need a shaman.

Name one.

Just one.

I’m super curious here.

You need to read my previous post lol.

https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4822

Why do you keep not reading and asking the same question that's been answered? It makes you look silly.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's no "allowed" or "not allowed". You're free to bring up pocket characters. I'm free to find any argument relying on them unconvincing.

By the way, if you’re going to quote him please do not snip out the second half that provides all the relevant context and then agree “precisely” with the point he was not actually making.

You still haven’t named one single camp that requires a shaman. You claimed you could. Why won’t you? I’ll give you an off ramp here buddy. Just say “I chose the wrong words. I didn’t actually mean ‘requires a shaman’ I actually meant is easier with a shaman”.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By the way, if you’re going to quote him please do not snip out the second half that provides all the relevant context and then agree “precisely” with the point he was not actually making.

You still haven’t named one single camp that requires a shaman. You claimed you could. Why won’t you? I’ll give you an off ramp here buddy. Just say “I chose the wrong words. I didn’t actually mean ‘requires a shaman’ I actually meant is easier with a shaman”.

You changed the word to "requires" for this post specifically, which I didn't say. I am not sure why you keep trying to play word games. Can you quote me where I said a Shaman is required for a camp?

When will you read my previous post to find your answer? I answered your question without the word "requires" multiple times, and you just keep asking.

https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4822

As for Bcbrown's quote, the first part of the quote is the relevant part. Pocket characters are allowed, and are a normal part of P99. The second part just states the obvious that he can find any argument he wants. That doesn't mean any argument is good.

I am looking at the reality of P99 and incorporating it into my assessment. I am not doing wishful thinking and assuming that people won't use pocket characters for some random reason.

[Ripqozko]

We really gonna hit 500, unbelievable

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He doesn't understand how Shamans work, and can't even name one camp that needs a Cleric, while I can name multiple camps that need a Shaman.

Grab a thesaurus. When used as verbs need and require are synonyms.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject. You said the above quote. If you can name multiple camps surely you’ll have an easy time naming one.

Or is it top sekrit?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Grab a thesaurus. When used as verbs need and require are synonyms.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject. You said the above quote. If you can name multiple camps surely you’ll have an easy time naming one.

Or is it top sekrit?

Thank you for admitting I didn't use the word required.

I am not sure how providing the post you requested is changing the subject. Please read it before posting again. The only thing you are doing is showing people you don't read what other people say.

https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4822

[Troxx]

Why do you keep posting a link to a post that references another post that doesn’t actually state any camp that needs/requires or for which a shaman is a necessity?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have provided multiple camps where a Shaman would be better.

Better is subjective and debatable. That is what you said. Verbatim. You then went on to explain that a cleric will struggle with aoe’s and enchanter pets being dispelled without acknowledging that the shaman will still have to heal everyone and juggle the clerical duties when subbed in the place of the cleric.

Needs, requires or is a necessity for is more concrete and would not be debatable if true.

C’mon man. You said it. Cough it up or just admit what we all already know is true. You told a little lie to advance your argument.

Ps: As a snarky side giggle, if you are going to advocate for having a pocket cleric maybe I could advocate for every caster having 3 full bags of 10 dose wort potions so they done have to worry about WW dragon aoe damage