Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do it.

What named?

What camp?

You will not and can not because it does not exist.

I already did multiple times. Shaman is better for Fungi King and West Waste Dragons compared to a Cleric. Those are two easy examples. You have yet to name a camp a Cleric is better at, or needed at. As usual, you never provide anything, and just keep asking for evidence after it's already provided.

Just look at the Mage DPS debate. You still haven't posted the logs, and I posted multiple videos with logs for my Shaman points.

You haven't explained what a pocket character is either. You clearly don't know what pocket characters are, since you keep insisting they can be any character for some strange reason.

The reality is you are afraid to be wrong, so you don't want to put any information out. It's sad. It's ok to admit you were wrong sometimes.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I already did multiple times. Shaman is better for Fungi King and West Waste Dragons compared to a Cleric.

"Better" (subjective) is not the same as "needs a shaman". Congratulations. You have come up with 2 situations that are subjectively easier with a shaman. I could assert that either could actually be better with a CLERIC when you have 2x enchanters + another actually good caster class.

Fungi? Biggest issue there is actually the PULL. Cleric with DA to help a NECROMANCER split is actually a hell of a lot better than what a shaman could do.

Sorry you failed.

Thank you for conceding DSM....

God that's gotta hurt!

Thank you for conceding DSM!

DSM has conceded!!!

DSM HAS CONCEDED SO THREAD IS OVER!!!! REJOICE!!!

Thanks for conceding DSM! Thread is over?!



Thank you for conceding. You are the MTG of p99.

Tally ho ...

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Better" (subjective) is not the same as "needs a shaman". Congratulations. You have come up with 2 situations that are subjectively easier with a shaman. I could assert that either could actually be better with a CLERIC when you have 2x enchanters + another actually good caster class.

Fungi? Biggest issue there is actually the PULL. Cleric with DA to help a NECROMANCER split is actually a hell of a lot better than what a shaman could do.

Sorry you failed.

Thank you for conceding DSM....

God that's gotta hurt!

Thank you for conceding DSM!

DSM has conceded!!!

DSM HAS CONCEDED SO THREAD IS OVER!!!! REJOICE!!!

Thanks for conceding DSM! Thread is over?!



Thank you for conceding. You are the MTG of p99.

Tally ho ...

Thank you for melting down and conceding lol. People can see this post is deranged, like so many of your other posts.

You have yet to explain what pocket characters are. Currently you seem to think they are the same as main/alt characters.

You still can't name a camp a cleric is better or needed at. If you think "better" is subjective, you are silly lol. You can say a 95/100 score is better than a 90/100 score. This is objectively true while correctly using the word "better".

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I already did multiple times. Shaman is better for Fungi King and West Waste Dragons compared to a Cleric.

Perhaps better, but not required, right?