Best trio to self farm gear/dungeons

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

shaman is best

why? because fuck you, thats why

It's the second best solo class in the game, only behind an Enchanter. I am not sure when people forgot that on these forums. That isn't just my opinion either, most people agree with this.

Putting the two best solo classes together doesn't seem like much of a controversial opinion, and you can math out the differences between a level 50 Shaman and a level 50 Cleric in terms of damage mitigation.

You have a level 60 raid geared Enchanter yourself, Toxigen. Looks like you are extremely obsessed with Enchanters, because you say they are the best class for this trio. You're opinion is obviously skewed. See? I can do the same thing[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] It is a really bad attempt to discredit someone simply because they have a level 60 character on a 13 year old server that is extremely level 60 heavy.

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Silky your including slow in your equation. That is incorrect. It is already being done by the enchanter when needed. Can you accept this fact?

You forget that Slow costs mana, and takes up a spell slot. A Shaman can slow instead, which saves the Enchanter time, mana, and a spell slot. A Shaman can cannibalize too, so they have a bigger mana pool to play with. This really isn't difficult to understand. If your Enchanter is meditating often because they are doing all the work, your group isn't very efficient. There is a problem when your Enchanter is OOM and your Cleric is FM.

[Lampolo]

Either you answer my question or you are troll

[Lampolo]

Or you have lost the argument

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Either you answer my question or you are troll

I did answer your question in my previous post. I'll repost:

You forget that Slow costs mana, and takes up a spell slot. A Shaman can slow instead, which saves the Enchanter time, mana, and a spell slot. A Shaman can cannibalize too, so they have a bigger mana pool to play with. This really isn't difficult to understand. If your Enchanter is meditating often because they are doing all the work, your group isn't very efficient. There is a problem when your Enchanter is OOM and your Cleric is FM.

[Lampolo]

Saying the shaman can slow is not a logical argument. We alrdy know this. Having two showing classes is a waste of space in this trio. Having a free spell slot and extra mana for the enchanter does not equal more xp/hr. The enchanter can alrdy do their job in full without your help

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Saying the shaman can slow is not a logical argument. We alrdy know this. Having two showing classes is a waste of space in this trio. Having a free spell slot and extra mana for the enchanter does not equal more xp/hr. The enchanter can alrdy do their job in full without your help

You simply saying something isn't a logical argument... isn't a logical argument[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Under your logic the cleric is a waste of space because they share lulls/roots/stuns with the Enchanter. I guess you can't have two classes with similar spells lol. /sarcasm

If you have ever played an enchanter, you would know they are one of those classes that needs every spell slot they can get. They are also spending quite a bit of mana if they are actively playing.

And yes, an Enchanter can solo efficiently without a Cleric or a Shaman. That helps prove my point!

[Lampolo]

OK then let's go with your logic. We might as well have 2 tanks cause then they can mitigate more dmg. Your arguments only make sense to you or a new player. This is why I say stop giving advice. You can't make sense of anything

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OK then let's go with your logic. We might as well have 2 tanks cause then they can mitigate more dmg. Your arguments only make sense to you or a new player. This is why I say stop giving advice. You can't make sense of anything

I am not sure how you came to the conclusion that having two classes with slow is equal to having two tanks. You are really shooting yourself in the foot here.

You do know that people run trios with 2 Enchanters, right? That is literally a complete duplication of all spells (including slows!), but it still works great. Are you going to say that a trio with 2 Enchanters is bad? With your logic it is bad, because there are two classes with slow in the same trio.

[Lampolo]

Who said a trio with two showers is bad? You doing strawman again?

[Lampolo]

It's not best xp trio moron. That's what I said