Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:21 AM
Bruman Bruman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrano [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I spend my day doing organic chemistry and playing video games, what did you expect my answer to be? Doesn't everyone on here have ugly GFs?
No. Some of us have ugly wives.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruman View Post
Leapfrogging is a dick move. It's not about "rules" or "ZOMG IT HAPPENED ON MY SERVER ITS FAIR".
Truth.
  #132  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:24 AM
Uaellaen Uaellaen is offline
Planar Protector

Uaellaen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And TMO had 1000+... So...?
yeah but not on spawn, and not as first ... wich are also kinda criterias ...

but hey, who cares! get back to raging, this is boring
__________________
[60 High Priest] Uuaellaen (Dark Elf)
[55 Conjurer] Uaellaen (Dark Elf)
[24 Rogue] Uaellaenn (Dark Elf) *retired*
  #133  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:24 AM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

What your failing to understand is this, that your guild CLAIMED to have the first 15 on the spawn. Even tho TMO was doing Juggs / Prot, and claims to have 15+ there prior.

What is at debate, is having 15 to claim a spawn is not a valid rule, because it is not SUFFICIENT TO KILL THE FUCKING DRAGON. So, saying you had 15 there first is a moot point, because it does not SATISFY THE MOTHER FUCKING RULE OF SUFFICIENT RAID FORCE TO KILL THE FUCKING DRAGON.

Ok, so, since neither guild can claim to have the first SUFFICIENT MOTHER FUCKING RAID FORCE ON THE SPAWN...

We go to FTE, which was TMO. Then GM on the spot decision, which was TMO.

Ok, now, if you want a more thorough understanding of how that line of logic works, give me vent info. Cause your falling into Harrison and Vermicelli realm of stupidity.
  #134  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:25 AM
Loly Taa Loly Taa is offline
Kobold

Loly Taa's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uaellaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yeah but not on spawn, and not as first ... wich are also kinda criterias ...

but hey, who cares! get back to raging, this is boring
You can't read very well can you?

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=128

Read that over again.
  #135  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:26 AM
johnny ringo johnny ringo is offline
Orc

johnny ringo's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 49
Default

less than 200 EQ units in radius
  #136  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:26 AM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Both guilds claimed first, no GM was there to make a ruling when it happened. There was no CLEAR fraps of who or what was first. Not that I have seen. If you have, and it is clearly that Trak, and clearly evident (also need some UI addons to show whats even Trak's lair)... then you should resort to what was used at the site of the kill, which is FTE...

How do you not get this? Where are you from? Mexico?
  #137  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:27 AM
Uaellaen Uaellaen is offline
Planar Protector

Uaellaen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,161
Default

wait, explain it to me again
__________________
[60 High Priest] Uuaellaen (Dark Elf)
[55 Conjurer] Uaellaen (Dark Elf)
[24 Rogue] Uaellaenn (Dark Elf) *retired*
  #138  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:27 AM
Tiggles Tiggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loly Taa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yendor, I usually respect your opinion but you don't get what's going on here.


The inference is that we should suggest a rotation- a rotation is nothing but detrimental to us because of;

A) We have less keys than TR
B) TR has been consistently losing Trakanon.

It's not about us trying to be dicks. We don't want the same shit that is happening with Trakanon to happen with VP. If we cave and make some sort of deal with TR to split Trakanon, we get keys at the same rate they do- and they have _more_keys_than_us_

Doesn't really sound like an amicable situation does it?

TR never even considered doing rotations until we started cockslapping them- When we did, they started to have a change of heart. "I don't understand why we feel we need to have all the mobs and not let anyone else get any"

They never admitted these feelings publicly, because it would make them look like the inferior guild.

I'll tell you right now. I'm not going to bow to them so they feel superior. They would've never considered a rotation outside of losing a boatload of Trakanons with no end in sight. This situation has nothing to do with us not trying to make the server a better place to be, and everything to do with TR scraping and clawing to keep their position as #1 on the server.

No, this situation has to do with a bunch of little whiny bitches grasping at straws to try to keep their flawed idea of being the dominant force on this server consistently, alive.

If you want to feel superior TR, _be_ superior. Is it that hard?

How about we do a rotation but we get the next 5 traks then we rotate?

I'm sure TR would LOVE that
  #139  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:31 AM
Bruman Bruman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 456
Default

Stupid thread is stupid. Arguing over rules that have no value. Both guilds are totally capable of killing Trak - it's not a challenge. There is no competition for this mob. It's rofflestomp for both. This is why all modern MMOs using instancing.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruman View Post
Leapfrogging is a dick move. It's not about "rules" or "ZOMG IT HAPPENED ON MY SERVER ITS FAIR".
Truth.
  #140  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:32 AM
johnny ringo johnny ringo is offline
Orc

johnny ringo's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 49
Default

bruman seems to have quite a handle on the obvious.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.