Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Now you understand what you have been doing to me for 250 pages. Progress!
You are asking me to prove a negative by asking me to prove my data is valid.
|
No. You are simply being asked to provide relevent data. The irrelevant data that you have provided - which you seem to believe "others are asking you to prove is valid" - is simply irrelevant to this discussion, and its "validity" is simply irrelevant to this discussion. Only the validity of relevant data/evidence would be relevant. This really isn't hard hehe.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are making the claim my data and math is invalid. It is up to you to prove this claim.
|
The irrelevance of your data invalidates it from being relevant data - does that verbiage help you understand?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You really can't take what you dish out for 250 pages.
|
I am not sure why your post indicates that you believe that you know and can make objective claims about what others "can't take", and you have provided zero evidence to support that belief, and I am not sure what point you think you are making or fact you think you are refuting in the above Quote.