![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
I personally would NEVER choose to camp something like fungi king and clear 3-4 spawns and go AFK for 20+ minutes. I'd much rather continue actually playing the game in between PH's and killing shit. Even if its only for minimal trash loot. You also get the added benefit of buffer xp assuming not every single player is 99% into 60 all the time. Additional DPS 100% gets you more kills if you're continually killing things. There are TONS of available mobs that can be pulled at fungi camp. Respawns are far too slow in this game for any realistic amount of DPS to gain you extra named cycles in a short timeframe. But I'm guessing you know this and that's exactly why you keep bringing up this argument. Because you know shaman DPS sucks and this was the best argument you could come up with for why more DPS doesn't matter. Even though it's a shitty argument and everyone (including you deep down) knows it. If you've been consistent about one thing this entire thread it has been that you try to spin everything you possibly can to be in favor of shamans. Even going as far as answering the "What's the best 4 man caster/priest group?" question with "Actually it's a 5 man group with a pocket cleric cause I love shamans so much".
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
|
|