Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So far:
-shamans are almost as good dps as mages (wrong)
-warriors solo better than enchanters after they get charm (wrong)
-shamans can root rot 5 mobs in fast moving xp groups to “help out” (wrong)
-unnecessary utility is better than more dps cause moar heals/utility always bettah (wrong)
-we are bringing pocket clerics into this theoretical discussion (lol wtf?)
This thread keeps on giving!
|
The rest is whatever, but, the point about warriors was that at low levels, pre-30ish, a twinked warrior levels faster than enchanters. If it's not faster, I'm sure it's quite close, but I'm pretty sure you could level a twinked warrior faster than you could level a twinked [any caster] because twinking melee characters is extremely powerful at low levels relative to casters.
Like, starting fresh twinked characters, the warrior would get a huge lead anyways because they basically insta-kill everything they touch until they're like level 15.
I don't care how you feel about DSM but people trying to say that low level twinked casters are somehow faster at soloing than twinked [any melee character] who have just way, way higher DPS and tankiness at those levels makes me think I'm taking crazy pills. Once the bullshit of twink gear fades, totally, I agree with you, the raw power of casters is just better, but low level mobs aren't really designed to handle the damage output of the dank ass weapons, haste, and regen items you can give melee characters.
I've never heard the take that low level melee twinks are bad at leveling, ever. Am I crazy? Like I honestly can't tell if this is just some stupid contrarian take because you don't like DSM or you've just never given a melee character dope gear and plowed through the beginning of the game before.