Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol again, the DPS numbers aren't changing based on solo vs. group. Where do you think this magical change in DPS occurs? The level 27 charmed mob I showed you is still doing 11.7 DPS, and the Warrior is still doing 15 DPS.

But it is, you can have 3 mobs beat on 1 pet that's 11.7 x3 plus pet dmg, break and nuke. If ya not solo mana is not an issue others can root

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But it is, you can have 3 mobs beat on 1 pet that's 11.7 x3 plus pet dog, break and nuke. If ya not solo mana is not an issue others can root

Being in a group doesn't change how much mana/time it takes to root 3 mobs and charm 1 pet, plus the root breaks/charm breaks that can occur. There is no Necro twitching, or Mage making mod/rods. You are too low level.

It's faster and better just to churn through mobs at that level.

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Being in a group doesn't change how much mana/time it takes to root 3 mobs and charm 1 pet, plus the root breaks/charm breaks that can occur. There is no Necro twitching, or Mage making mod/rods. You are too low level.

It's faster and better just to churn through mobs at that level.

You have 4 that can root, root only has to last 30sec, you even said you prefer to snare, they only got to beat on it for like 15sec then break and nuke

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have 4 that can root, root only has to last 30sec, you even said you prefer to snare, they only got to beat on it for like 15sec then break and nuke

I didn't say I preferred snare. Again, it is up to you to prove your strategy is better at low levels. I have been leveling my low level characters. Casters are not quite as good at that level range due to lower channeling (more interrupts), lower mana, worse buffs, more fizzling, etc.

Again, this whole argument of "classes are dead weight" at low levels is silly, because a lot of classes are at low levels. Luckily mobs are so easy it doesn't matter, and you can just churn through them anyway. A Warrior is doing more DPS than a charmed pet, because low level mobs are weak.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Being in a group doesn't change how much mana/time it takes to root 3 mobs and charm 1 pet, plus the root breaks/charm breaks that can occur. There is no Necro twitching, or Mage making mod/rods. You are too low level.

It's faster and better just to churn through mobs at that level.

Lol Cleric with no mana regen trying to heal a warrior getting beat on non stop. Ok

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol Cleric with no mana regen trying to heal a warrior getting beat on non stop. Ok

My Warrior loses very little life. At low levels AC is a beast. Plus with three other group members you are just slaughtering mobs before they can do much.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My Warrior loses very little life. At low levels AC is a beast. Plus with three other group members you are just slaughtering mobs before they can do much.

Sure Jan

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure Jan

You could always show counter-evidence[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] But you probably won't. I am not sure why you are doubting me, when you can't even prove your own point.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You could always show counter-evidence[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] But you probably won't. I am not sure why you are doubting me, when you can't even prove your own point.

Because there's no point that even needs to be proven as everyone else has detailed lol. You're simply just wrong.

At this point I just assume you are trolling because no one could be this wrong but also so adamant that they are right. It's unreal lol

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You could always show counter-evidence[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] But you probably won't.

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?