Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). It is the precise number I calculated. His DPS is 40 simply because he is nuking more per encounter, but math-wise this also means they aren't pulling mobs that fast. His previous encounter data shows an average kill speed of 36 seconds, and he has yet to provide average kill speed for this data set.

There are two ways you can interpret this data:

1. You can believe Troxx, who is claiming his DPS parser is undervaluing the data by 30%. If that is true, then honestly all of the data he has posted so far is meaningless because his parser is wrong, and he needs to get a better parser.

2. GamParse did it's job and parsed Troxx's DPS correctly. The reason why he thinks the data is undervalued by 30% is because his similarly equipped Monk can do 70 DPS when he isn't pulling. That is where he is getting the 30% number, 70 x 0.7 = 49. The flaw in Troxx's logic is the Monk is only losing 30% DPS because he is pulling, NOT because the parser is wrong. Troxx isn't pulling, he is just sitting in camp DPSing and parsing. He is not losing any DPS, so there is no 30% loss for him. He is basically falsely assuming that if the Monk loses 30% DPS, everybody else is losing 30% DPS too. The parser is correct, and Troxx is wrong.

Either way, he basically has nothing to back up his silly points. The burden of proof now lies on him to either provide better data, or prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%, and not just the Monk who is pulling lol.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.

The ball is in Troxx's court. He claims his own data is bad. If that is true, I have hard evidence via videos and logs, and he has nothing. The only people keeping this thread alive are Troxx and friends. Either provide better data, or concede.

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3/4 of the way there, keep it rolling boys

The trolls will get bored eventually. Or perhaps Troxx will actually provide data that he claims isn't bad, and we can come to a consensus, one way or another.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The ball is in Troxx's court. He claims his data is bad.

He does not claim his data is "bad". What he DOES claim is visible on his posts... you may continue to misinterpret and/or misrepresent those posts if you choose to, but that does not change the facts. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If that is true,

It is not. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You made it up, see above. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have hard evidence via videos and logs, and he has nothing. The only people keeping this thread alive are Troxx and friends. Either provide better data, or concede.

Troxx has provided exactly the amount of data that has been posted to this thread (by Troxx), visible to all here - not "nothing". [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That you continue to misinterpret or be unable to understand such data, or that you misconstrue it (whether intentionally or otherwise) or move the goalposts of the discussion (as has been pointed out to you by multiple posters in this thread) does not mean "the data needs to be better". [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You might be surprised what others are willing to concede - especially if it is warranted/justified! What would you like Troxx or any other posters in this thread to concede exactly?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The trolls will get bored eventually. Or perhaps Troxx will actually provide data that he claims isn't bad, and we can come to a consensus, one way or another.

Troxx DID provide data, Troxx DID NOT claim his data is bad. Why are you saying that? Are you arguing from bad faith? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]