Joke 6 Committee "Hearing"

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Garbage? Explain… even ignoring Rain’s insist on talking about privilege to my discussion on order.

Mr. Bannon's tenure as a White House employee ended in 2017

The committee could assuredly still request Bannon to discuss event before Jan 6 2020 while ignoring the time before his tenure. Still making it illegal for Bannon refuse the request.

Conversations with the president after his tenure were not off limit.

Plus

Released on 10/8/2021
And even if the committee was "inclined to accept the unsupported premise" that executive privilege reaches communications between Bannon and Trump, the letter notes that Bannon "does not enjoy any form of absolute immunity from testifying or producing documents in response to a Congressional subpoena."

Announced on 10/18/2021
January 6 committee rejects Bannon's executive privilege claim

Followed up by President Biden saying on 10/26/2021
He Disallowed executive privilege from the previous president being allowed.
This is Biden’s right
”The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the President of the United States“ (note not from Wikipedia)

Yes I know the committee has disallowed the EP invocation.

That's...the problem. There's no basis for this in history or law.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes I know the committee has disallowed the EP invocation.

That's...the problem. There's no basis for this in history or law.

When was the last time a sitting president tried to overthrow the U.S. government just because he lost an election?

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When was the last time a sitting president tried to overthrow the U.S. government just because he lost an election?

Non sequitur. Not the topic.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Non sequitur. Not the topic.

You brought up history.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You brought up history.

Right and then you talked about something else in history. That's why it doesn't apply.

[Jibartik]

That's only history if your side wins the civil war it starts over that fake history you just regurgitated.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

s̶o̶m̶e̶t̶h̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶e̶l̶s̶e̶ in history.

fake history

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's only history if your side wins the civil war it starts over that fake history you just regurgitated.

Trump didn't try to have Pence killed so he could overturn the election results?

[Jibartik]

absolutly not lol that is more insane than my annunaki shit

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump didn't try to have Pence killed so he could overturn the election results?

Nope! Word got out among the rioters that Pence wasn't having any of the Constitutional angle so they went big mad mode.

The bipartisan Electoral Count Act wouldn't be needed if elections procedures were a settled question.

Fwiw I think states can do *fucking whatever they want* but VP probably can't stunt that hard.

*emphasis