Human Brain Computer

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even more questions now

are we rating her looks as if she were a flower in a meadow? or a woman in the red light district?

Kevin was right, "a painting can be beautiful, but i don't wanna bang a painting"

as far as humans rating other human's looks, the entire mechanism is designed to make males and females pair off and procreate.

Given Swank's definite physical health and prowess as a potential female breeding candidate, then the answer to this question across the board of breeding age human males is unequivocally:

"I'd Hit That"

Yeah we are GENERALLY hard-wired biologically to be attracted to what we perceive as the best possible candidate for birthing healthy children. This is why the ideal is someone taking care of themselves physically, as this is an indicator of overall health. There are always outliers, both personal and cultural. Personal is obvious, everyone has what they’re into which might be very gaunt or very big people or anything in between. And culturally for example I remember hearing in i believe Italian culture being an overweight man was an indicator that someone is doing well financially, and was historically seen as a status symbol

For women, they are generally hard-wired to be attracted to someone who can provide for and protect a future family. This is why (unfortunately for a lot of guys) height is such a big deal, and money can be as well because money is an indicator of stability and success. Once again this is just generalities, everyone has their own specific personal ideal, and these can be very different

And yeah I’d hit it with Hillary Swank, wouldn’t even need to be drunk