Arizona election audit finds massive fraud and irregularities

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Thorgrimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gas Prices through the roof

Skyrocketing out of control inflation

Government openly admitting they are using social media to spy on private citizens and suppress Free Speech

You might not care, but there are a lot of people that do

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

100% of people didnt show up for this

Maybe he should fuck off?

[Nirgon]

Pennsylvania:

According to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s own data, 6,962,621 ballots were cast in the November 2020 election. According to Pennsylvania’s systems, however, only 6,760,230 registered voters voted. This is a total of 202,391 votes that cannot be attributed to a registered voter.

Where did these votes come from? According to the state’s own records – not from any registered voter. They somehow just magically appeared in the system.

It should be noted by the way that logically enough no vote can be legally counted in Pennsylvania unless it is connected to an identified registered voter. That means, by definition, that all 202,391 excess votes were illegal.

The margin of victory for Biden in Pennsylvania was 80,555 votes.

Georgia:

The election integrity group VoterGA has filed a lawsuit against the State of Georgia demanding to inspect Fulton County, Georgia ballots. A few days ago, the group released findings from its review of publicly available information concerning Fulton County’s hand count audit of the November 2020 election. The information shows that the audit was riddled with massive errors and provable fraud.

VoterGA’s analysis revealed that 923 of 1539 mail-in ballot batch files contained votes incorrectly reported in Fulton’s official November 3rd, 2020, results. This means the error reporting rate in Fulton’s hand count audit is an unimaginable and unexplainable 60%.

According to the VoterGA press release on its findings, “One type of error discovered involved duplicate results reporting for batches. The team found at least 36 batches of mail-in ballots with 4,255 total extra votes were redundantly added to Fulton November audit results. This includes 3,390 extra votes for Joe Biden, 865 extra votes for Donald Trump and 43 extra votes for Jo Jorgenson.”

And, yet this is not the worst of the news. VoterGA did not just find errors. It found extensive, undeniable fraud. “The VoterGA team found 7 falsified audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals for their respective batches. For example, a batch containing 60 ballot images for Joe Biden, 50 for Donald Trump was reported as 100 for Biden, and 0 for Trump. The 7 batches of ballot images with 554 votes for Joe Biden, 140 votes for Donald Trump, and 11 votes for Jo Jorgenson had tally sheets in the audit falsified to show 850 votes for Biden, 0 votes for Trump and 0 votes for Jorgenson.”

All of these findings were based on information already publicly available. No one has any real idea how vast the fraud is that will not be identified until and unless the court grants VoterGA the access it is seeking.

The margin of victory for Biden in Georgia was 12,670 votes.

What we are now beginning to see is incontrovertible. There was massive fraud in the November 2020 election. Utilizing the opportunities afforded by the sudden and unjustifiable move to mail-in voting, the Democratic Party appears to have stolen a Presidential election.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So no one has any evidence of where those 74k mail ins came from or who filled them out?

OK, I'll check back

Remember, its what you can prove

Edit: https://t.me/praying_medic/3203

"Earlier today Foxnews and a number of other heavily conservative news networks ran a pre-planned fallacy to prop-up readied claims for similar states like Wisconsin to request partisan third party voting audits in a perpetuating money scheme to continue fleecing money from Donald Trump supporters. Powering their narrative that the 2020 election was fraudulent.

The claim, for instance, that 'we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent' to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that 'hundreds of thousands of votes' were in dispute.

Claims continued that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. It was expressed a logical explanation couldn't be found for this suspicion.

Steal proven!

Except—no. There was a logical explanation, the voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.

You know who doesn't show up on Maricopa's ev32 (sent file) but will show up on the ev33 (early receive file)?

In person early voters not on the Permanent Early Voter List.

https://twitter.com/Garrett_Archer/s...87039866310657


Cyber Ninja's are using a fallacy (Lying with Statistics) to trump supporters to get their support they need for the next scam."

Lying with Statistics: The contemporary fallacy of misusing true figures and numbers to “prove” unrelated claims. (e.g. "In real terms, attending college has never been cheaper than it is now. When expressed as a percentage of the national debt, the cost of getting a college education is actually far less today than it was back in 1965!"). A corrupted argument from logos, often preying on the public's perceived or actual mathematical ignorance. This includes the Tiny Percentage Fallacy, that an amount or action that is quite significant in and of itself somehow becomes insignificant simply because it's a tiny percentage of something much larger. E.g., the arbitrary arrest, detention or interception of "only" a few hundred legally-boarded international travelers as a tiny percentage of the tens of thousands who normally arrive. Under this same fallacy a consumer who would choke on spending an extra dollar for two cans of peas will typically ignore $50 extra on the price of a car or $1000 extra on the price of a house simply because these differences are "only" a tiny percentage of the much larger amount being spent. Historically, sales taxes or value-added taxes (VAT) have successfully gained public acceptance and remain "under the radar" because of this latter fallacy, even though amounting to hundreds or thousands of dollars a year in extra tax burden. See also Half-truth, the Snow Job, and the Red Herring.

[Botten]

Reading through list of 146 fallacies I am surprised they didn't mention this one..

Meh whatever.. mystery solved...

Measurability: A corrupt argument from logos and ethos (that of science and mathematics), the modern Fallacy of Measurability proposes that if something cannot be measured, quantified and replicated it does not exist, or is "nothing but anecdotal, touchy-feely stuff" unworthy of serious consideration, i.e., mere gossip or subjective opinion. Often, achieving "Measurability" necessarily demands preselecting, "fiddling" or "massaging" the available data simply in order to make it statistically tractable, or in order to support a desired conclusion. Scholar Thomas Persing thus describes "The modernist fallacy of falsely and inappropriately applying norms, standardizations, and data point requirements to quantify productivity or success. This is similar to complex question, measurability, and oversimplification fallacies where the user attempts to categorize complicated / diverse topics into terms that when measured, suit their position. For example, the calculation of inflation in the United States doesn't include the changes in the price to gasoline, because the price of gasoline is too volatile, despite the fact gasoline is necessary for most people to live their lives in the United States." See also, "A Priori Argument," "Lying with Statistics," and the "Procrustean Fallacy."

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Thorgrimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Skyrocketing out of control inflation

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously, I fuckin told you all. You know, I really didnt understand how biden was able to muster the votes required for a general win.

Now I do understand, with irrefutable proof.

The rest of you are fuckin' idiots who do not deserve their voice, or the land upon which they reside. You, I'm talking to you, Libtard. You know who you are.

I fucking told you so. I told you all.

Your ideas are still ugly, egoist. Liberty for all.

[Nirgon]

Hey anyone able to provide any evidence against these claims? No? Ok, I'll check back later when you have some.

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey anyone able to provide any evidence against these claims? No? Ok, I'll check back later when you have some.

It's your claim, u prove it. The whole of it - why it's fraud.

Right now you've only posted a number and gotten smug.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Earlier today Foxnews and a number of other heavily conservative news networks ran a pre-planned fallacy to prop-up readied claims for similar states like Wisconsin to request partisan third party voting audits in a perpetuating money scheme to continue fleecing money from Donald Trump supporters. Powering their narrative that the 2020 election was fraudulent.

The claim, for instance, that 'we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent' to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail. This basic conflation was the most eye-popping claim of the hearing and led to Trump’s allegation that 'hundreds of thousands of votes' were in dispute.

Claims continued that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. It was expressed a logical explanation couldn't be found for this suspicion.

Steal proven!

Except—no. There was a logical explanation, the voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.

You know who doesn't show up on Maricopa's ev32 (sent file) but will show up on the ev33 (early receive file)?

In person early voters not on the Permanent Early Voter List.

https://twitter.com/Garrett_Archer/s...87039866310657


Cyber Ninja's are using a fallacy (Lying with Statistics) to trump supporters to get their support they need for the next scam."

Lying with Statistics: The contemporary fallacy of misusing true figures and numbers to “prove” unrelated claims. (e.g. "In real terms, attending college has never been cheaper than it is now. When expressed as a percentage of the national debt, the cost of getting a college education is actually far less today than it was back in 1965!"). A corrupted argument from logos, often preying on the public's perceived or actual mathematical ignorance. This includes the Tiny Percentage Fallacy, that an amount or action that is quite significant in and of itself somehow becomes insignificant simply because it's a tiny percentage of something much larger. E.g., the arbitrary arrest, detention or interception of "only" a few hundred legally-boarded international travelers as a tiny percentage of the tens of thousands who normally arrive. Under this same fallacy a consumer who would choke on spending an extra dollar for two cans of peas will typically ignore $50 extra on the price of a car or $1000 extra on the price of a house simply because these differences are "only" a tiny percentage of the much larger amount being spent. Historically, sales taxes or value-added taxes (VAT) have successfully gained public acceptance and remain "under the radar" because of this latter fallacy, even though amounting to hundreds or thousands of dollars a year in extra tax burden. See also Half-truth, the Snow Job, and the Red Herring.

Hmm.. But how do you explain that picture? That sealed the deal for me.

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your ideas are still ugly, egoist. Liberty for all.

Hairy Trexler and the 5 "I's" [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]