|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who are the bad guys here? | |||
| Seal Team & Kingdom because those tryhards wont let me get mine. |
   
|
48 | 50.00% |
| Castle because they couldn't figure out how to win book races |
  
|
32 | 33.33% |
| GMs and server staff because this game is too hard. We have lives bro! |
  
|
8 | 8.33% |
| Wow that "casual" guild Dynasty sounds toxic AF... |
  
|
8 | 8.33% |
| Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#3
05-23-2021, 12:19 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
05-23-2021, 12:22 PM
|
|||
|
The only conclusion I can draw from this is it's a kingdom player posting under a burner account crying because Castle pulled out of the agreement (which is meaningless with a casual guild that's won no books that represents no threat), which caused ST to pull out of the same agreement. Kingdom is terrified ST will take away their scraps by moving onto bag limits next. It's definitely not an outraged ST character because the top guild would have no need to keep mentioning "ST and Kingdom" together in the same line because no first place guild would clump themselves with a distant second place to try and shame a casual guild for pulling from a biased agreement that wasn't working for them.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
05-23-2021, 12:47 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
05-23-2021, 07:48 PM
|
|||
|
So a guild that had no books drops from an agreement that clearly did nothing for them. They probably needed, what, 2 books or something? But then every other guild in the agreement decided that's not fair and withdrew from the agreement, an agreement they all claimed was amazing and fair for everyone, without making any attempt to revise it in the 72 hour notice period. And now those same raiding guilds are threatening the causal guilds further saying this will further reduce their odds? How do you go below 0 books? Lol. The casual guilds had nothing to lose. In fact, they're probably laughing at the non-casual guilds because of their knee jerk withdrawal which will lead them all to pull the usual BS and try to petition each other fighting tooth and nail for more books.
Meanwhile half the UN comments are from Kingdom talking about GM mental health as if they're just looking out for the staff. If I was a GM I'd ban Kingdom first for trying to speak for the GMs, and second for trying to use their 'concern' for the mental health of the GMs to conceal their attempts to manipulate and twist the situation to try and shame a guild for pulling out of a player agreement. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
05-25-2021, 12:30 AM
|
||||
|
Smaller guilds probably wouldn't have cared about waiting for the bigger guilds to be done before trying except it became obvious they were never going to stop running the same rogues and corpsing extra books. The agreement should have been that rogues without Ragebringers could run while it was still relevant.
The UN shit had the big guilds crying because they didn't want to track their own books. It was easy for them to just devote minimal effort and pick up a free book every 10 hours on their rogues with the best SSD load times. Smaller guilds who want their rogues to get their epics are willing to track the book themselves, not share the info, and actually compete for it, which ST got mad about. Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
