Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-22-2010, 11:59 AM
Ajax Ajax is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Default

I have a distinct memory of Gaylen on EMarr grinding hell levels (54 or 59)in Burning woods charming the named wurms.

I would trade druid buffs for crack and, I remember being a bit pissed that he was making better xp than i was quad kiting.

No clue how long his charms were lasting just saying that he was very successful at it.

For time ref this would be a month or two after Kunark release.
Last edited by Ajax; 03-22-2010 at 03:10 PM..
  #22  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:19 PM
Finawin Finawin is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 492
Send a message via AIM to Finawin
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Charm was sweet up until PoP after they nerfed it because of the chanter soloing in PoV and Halls of Honor.

On combine enchanters would lock down swashbucklers in Timorous deep, Guks in lguk, ilis knights in sebilis, pirates in jaggedpine, or LDCs in solb. You had 3 kinds of enchanters, those that would buff and mez, those that would pull buff and mez, or those that would charm buff mez and maybe pull.

If you rolled around with nothing but scrub chanters than I could see you thinking that way though.
Combine isn't classic.

That whole post is irrelevant.
  #23  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:27 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My primary recollection with classic Charm was that the overwhelming majority of Enchanters regarded it as worthless/suicidal and rarely/never used it.

Danth
You're right, that WAS the overwhelming majority opinion. However, NONE of those enchanters had 255 charisma. I played an enchanter when that mindset changed, and after that charm was used much more often.

Same story with any of a slew of techniques that have been discovered SINCE classic, that allows classes to be played NON-CLASSICALLY by classic rules.

CHA 255 enchanters should be able to viably charm pets. It should always be hit and miss, and a dangerous proposition, but in a somewhat controlled environment, it shouldn't be an issue.
__________________
  #24  
Old 03-23-2010, 07:25 AM
Ermonican Ermonican is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: White Plains NY
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
CHA 255 enchanters should be able to viably charm pets. It should always be hit and miss, and a dangerous proposition, but in a somewhat controlled environment, it shouldn't be an issue.
Ahh an opinion in regards to how CHA effects charm based on personal experience! This is what I was looking for, thank you Hasbin.

I really want to make a DE chanter, because they are the coolest ever [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] but I dont want to gimp myself with the CHA thing.
  #25  
Old 03-23-2010, 01:50 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

My live chanter was a DEF.
Only chanter on the server in full chainmail [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #26  
Old 03-23-2010, 02:08 PM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ermonican [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ahh an opinion in regards to how CHA effects charm based on personal experience! This is what I was looking for, thank you Hasbin.

I really want to make a DE chanter, because they are the coolest ever [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] but I dont want to gimp myself with the CHA thing.
As a chanter I strongly recommend you put all your points into Stamina. It's the only important stat you will not be able to max out via gear (and possibly a self buff) for a long time. For int and charisma, you should be able to hit 200 without much difficulty by the time you hit 50 and that's before Kunark is released.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
  #27  
Old 03-23-2010, 02:12 PM
Lyssia Lyssia is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 137
Default re

Agree with guineapig here. I made the mistake of maxing cha at creation and now wish i had done stamina also. Without planes gear and only using self buff though i now have a 255cha, my int only sits at 166. Manapool sucks until i get into planes raids and upgrade gear. Great for charming, but anything other then that your manaool wont support much


Lyssia
  #28  
Old 03-23-2010, 02:33 PM
Aeolwind Aeolwind is offline
Developer

Aeolwind's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Watauga, TN
Posts: 1,641
Send a message via AIM to Aeolwind Send a message via MSN to Aeolwind Send a message via Yahoo to Aeolwind
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have a distinct memory of Gaylen on EMarr grinding hell levels (54 or 59)in Burning woods charming the named wurms.

I would trade druid buffs for crack and, I remember being a bit pissed that he was making better xp than i was quad kiting.

No clue how long his charms were lasting just saying that he was very successful at it.

For time ref this would be a month or two after Kunark release.
Gaylen was just as nuts as Enki, he rerolled beastlord at some point through there. I did a Royal Run in chardok with him, he kept that one golem up top charmed the whole run lol. He had Yenom backing him up though when charm broke though.
__________________
I have walked my way since the beginning of time. Sometimes I give, sometimes I take & it is mine to know which and when.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilbog
If all the polls I have done up until now fully counted, you would be playing on some abomination of a PVP server with 2-10 boxing based on votes from people named xcm234nv and adfa234.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.