Loot Code?

[Alawen Everywhere]

Randomized events will not produce the homogeneous results you are anticipating.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Alawen Everywhere [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Randomized events will not produce the homogeneous results you are anticipating.

Try telling that to a statistics major, and see how far you get. XD

[siinge]

i camped drezu or w/e her name was 3 spawn in najena a month ago... 9 hrs for my jboots, 9 fucking hours on a 18.5min spawn timer... pls son it only gets worse as you lvl up and camp bigger shit, ever camp a fungi? raster? manastone?

i would say some drops are not as prevalent as they should seem imho up the drops and lets blow out this economy

[Haynar]

After my 72 hours spent, over several sessions spread out over 2 weeks, I never got a Fungi.

68 hour camp straight, at StormFeather. I had faith in the 18 hr spawn, with possibility to skip spawns. It turned out to be accurate. I got some sleep in there, but it was a 3 day marathon.

Welcome to EverQuest. If the quests don't kill you, the camps will.

Haynar

[Aeolwind]

Spent 34 hours straight in SK once and never once saw Grimrot, I fell asleep, friends started kiting him, they logged me in and got the last part I needed for the Aegis. I hate him so much ><. On the flip side, when I started my monk I had to wait no longer than 30 minutes to get any drop I wanted for him. Fungi, all the headbands/sashes, robe, epic, fungi, etc.

[Ferok]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Try telling that to a statistics major, and see how far you get. XD

People major in statistics? :-\

[Alawen Everywhere]

Originally Posted by Ferok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People major in statistics? :-\

I'm fairly sure that Hasbin was trolling me there. A number generator with regularized results would be anything but random. Theories like the one proposed by the OP seem to be common among gamblers and gamers, but they really just reflect ignorance of the statistical significance of their own sample.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Alawen Everywhere [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm fairly sure that Hasbin was trolling me there. A number generator with regularized results would be anything but random. Theories like the one proposed by the OP seem to be common among gamblers and gamers, but they really just reflect ignorance of the statistical significance of their own sample.

OP should author a sample of 1,000 data points, which should reflect significant results for 500,000,000 actual events.

Please log and post!

[Dac321]

Originally Posted by Ferok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People major in statistics? :-\

Thats what statistics show.

[Ferok]

Originally Posted by Dac321 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thats what statistics show.

So the statisticians would have you believe!