RE: Some interesting new precedents with the recent ruling

[reznor_]

When Riot literally has cameramen not raiding, and following their competition around (OBS blazing) to try and pin something on them, idiocy is bound to occur.

There was a post from Arcler or *ity a year or two ago in the blue UN (I've since left because I can't stand to watch) for something about "good sportmanship, lets turn off the camera and just play the game". Riot is still a massive hypocrite when it comes to lawyerquesting (even worse than they were when they first formed), crying wolf while simultaneously writing a petition for nearly every mob they lose because their rotating staff of raid leaders (makes one wonder why it rotates like this) has their own strange interpretation of a rule. The thin glue which holds Riot together now is merely pixels (which they used to get all the time, truly a non-sarcastic props here), but that is now being eroded.

[Croco]

Originally Posted by reznor_ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When Riot literally has cameramen not raiding, and following their competition around (OBS blazing) to try and pin something on them, idiocy is bound to occur.

When the leader of an opposing guild logs in a riot guild bot and tries, fails, then tries again and the second time succeeds in training his former guild are you really going to sit there and tell me that having a ton of people running fraps and some subset of those people watching what the opposing guild is up to is somehow a bad idea?

Do I need to link the classic REEtoxx "sends you a tell" signature? What about the recording of Furoar talking about how you guys have a direct line to GM's via phone call and calling every other guild in the UN "losers". How long have your last couple growth clears taken? Just curious. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.