When the cope is so real.

[Babizul]

As per DePerno, a 68.05% error rate was assigned to Dominion Voting machines such that "68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication or are collected and kept in a folder--"sent somewhere where people in another location can change the votes."

DePerno explained to the Gateway Pundit that "the vote flipped based on the algorithm. It can be done manually or through a machine." This is "either a function of the program or it's done offsite" and "then sent back to the system" after it was adjudicated "or it was done internally in the program."

This proves that the alleged glitches of vote flipping that were discovered during the hearing of the Trump legal team with state legislators and whistleblowers were not human error but machine errors.

In addition, DePerno raised that the machines' systematic programming is designed to actually "generate errors that affect the outcome of the election" since it was "meticulously created to do exactly what it did". He said this was not done by amateurs but by "a major software company or foreign entity".

"This violates all cybersecurity protocols. It doesn't matter who you vote for. No one can be confident that with a 68.05% error rate that your ballot was not mass adjudicated," he said.

Allied's forensic report was actually conducted by a team of experts and professionals such as Harvard University MBA holder Russel James Ramsland, Jr. who previously worked for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Thus, the forensic results are credible.

[Vivitron]

Originally Posted by Babizul [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As per DePerno, a 68.05% error rate was assigned to Dominion Voting machines such that "68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication or are collected and kept in a folder--"sent somewhere where people in another location can change the votes."

DePerno explained to the Gateway Pundit that "the vote flipped based on the algorithm. It can be done manually or through a machine." This is "either a function of the program or it's done offsite" and "then sent back to the system" after it was adjudicated "or it was done internally in the program."

This proves that the alleged glitches of vote flipping that were discovered during the hearing of the Trump legal team with state legislators and whistleblowers were not human error but machine errors.

In addition, DePerno raised that the machines' systematic programming is designed to actually "generate errors that affect the outcome of the election" since it was "meticulously created to do exactly what it did". He said this was not done by amateurs but by "a major software company or foreign entity".

"This violates all cybersecurity protocols. It doesn't matter who you vote for. No one can be confident that with a 68.05% error rate that your ballot was not mass adjudicated," he said.

Allied's forensic report was actually conducted by a team of experts and professionals such as Harvard University MBA holder Russel James Ramsland, Jr. who previously worked for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Thus, the forensic results are credible.

Good news; they hand recounted these votes. https://www.freep.com/story/news/loc...ts/3937898001/

[Babizul]

Originally Posted by Vivitron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good news; they hand recounted these votes. https://www.freep.com/story/news/loc...ts/3937898001/

I know.

[Vivitron]

Originally Posted by Babizul [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know.

After the hand recount essentially matched Dominion in the relevant county, what remains interesting about the report?

[Babizul]

Originally Posted by Vivitron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

After the hand recount essentially matched Dominion in the relevant county, what remains interesting about the report?

The report shows what the machines are capable of. I don’t remember pointing out a specific county or making any statement further other than posting the result of the machine’s software analysis so I’m confused as to why you keep slinging around information while passively acting like I attacked you.

[douglas1999]

Originally Posted by Vivitron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

After the hand recount essentially matched Dominion in the relevant county, what remains interesting about the report?

In which relevant county? The hand recount in the county where 5000 votes flipped is precisely what detected the error there. It raises questions about where else this might have occured, it would take months to do the same thing in every county in the nation.

Which is a different issue than the georgia state-wide recount, where the allegation was that people who should not have voted did vote, or that fraudulent ballots were counted. Simply hand-counting the results that the machine already spit out would not catch either of those errors, which is why trump wanted an actual proper signature verification audit, and for voter rolls to be checked against voter turnout.

It's almost as if checking the integrity of 150 million votes in about a month would be hard to do. This is why it's so alarming and shady that democrats have been insisting over and over that it's pointless, and everything is fine, and please move along nothing to see here. Especially when they themselves have raised the exact same concerns in past elections.

[Cassawary]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

an actual proper signature verification audit

Up here we sign the envelope, not the ballot. How would that help?

Did you vote?