Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

View Poll Results: Does he
Yes 27 28.13%
No 14 14.58%
George Bush coughed on the towers 55 57.29%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4251  
Old 11-06-2020, 02:45 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 15,813
Default

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-ne...-20/index.html

Cnn getting confident
  #4252  
Old 11-06-2020, 02:46 PM
Woke Locc Woke Locc is offline
Planar Protector

Woke Locc's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mblake81 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What is ranked choice voting?
A communist plot, just like the political compass website.

(not joking)
  #4253  
Old 11-06-2020, 02:50 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 15,813
Default

Huh. Is Inception really about the media?
  #4254  
Old 11-06-2020, 02:54 PM
BlackBellamy BlackBellamy is offline
Planar Protector

BlackBellamy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: At the barricades.
Posts: 2,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mblake81 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What is ranked choice voting?
A simple fix to a complex problem.

For example, a major and complicated problem is that poor people don't get a voice. Sure they vote, but in the end they don't get what they want. If the policy that comes down matches what they want, that's an accident because rich people just happened to want that too.

There is an interesting study.

In short what they did was examine policy preferences of people in various economic strata and then they checked later to see whether there was any legislative movement on their concerns. And what they found was that if you ain't rich, the government isn't going to do shit.

Another huge problem is PACs and the bundling and that awful decision to let corporations be people and masquerade corruption as free speech.

More complications: People don't give a shit about policy and they vote with their wallets. You can see that in the exit polls this year; what was most important? Money. The economy. You couldn't throw enough world peace at them if it meant their 401k is going to suffer.

I know people are looking for a simple technical fix because that's easy, but the problems are more structural and probably need a full reno or at least knocking down the kitchen wall for a more open concept feel.

In any event RCV is in use here and there and has never produced results significantly different from the regular plurality method.
  #4255  
Old 11-06-2020, 02:58 PM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 10,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
https://youtu.be/PqbB07n_uQ4

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Omggg what a fun vidoe seriously.

ever get the feel that these guys kinda got a god vibe goin?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #4256  
Old 11-06-2020, 02:59 PM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 10,152
Default

Hi I am alive. Ask me anything.
  #4257  
Old 11-06-2020, 03:01 PM
hobart hobart is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topgunben [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When you elect Trump you get Trump

When you elect Biden, you get everything but Biden.
99% true. The problem is the Truptards who think this is a bad thing.

Consistently running off competent public servants and surrounding himself with incompetent suckups and sycophants is at the top of the list of the President's many failings.
  #4258  
Old 11-06-2020, 03:02 PM
Topgunben Topgunben is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,405
Default

If Tulsi Gabbard would have been nominated, this wouldn’t even be close.

But the Democrats had to choose the most establishment swamp creature they could find. Now no one is happy. Except for maybe President-Elect Kamala.
  #4259  
Old 11-06-2020, 03:05 PM
BlackBellamy BlackBellamy is offline
Planar Protector

BlackBellamy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: At the barricades.
Posts: 2,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hi I am alive. Ask me anything.
Would you like to contribute $45?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #4260  
Old 11-06-2020, 03:05 PM
Kich867 Kich867 is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBellamy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
A simple fix to a complex problem.

For example, a major and complicated problem is that poor people don't get a voice. Sure they vote, but in the end they don't get what they want. If the policy that comes down matches what they want, that's an accident because rich people just happened to want that too.

There is an interesting study.

In short what they did was examine policy preferences of people in various economic strata and then they checked later to see whether there was any legislative movement on their concerns. And what they found was that if you ain't rich, the government isn't going to do shit.

Another huge problem is PACs and the bundling and that awful decision to let corporations be people and masquerade corruption as free speech.

More complications: People don't give a shit about policy and they vote with their wallets. You can see that in the exit polls this year; what was most important? Money. The economy. You couldn't throw enough world peace at them if it meant their 401k is going to suffer.

I know people are looking for a simple technical fix because that's easy, but the problems are more structural and probably need a full reno or at least knocking down the kitchen wall for a more open concept feel.

In any event RCV is in use here and there and has never produced results significantly different from the regular plurality method.
After reading about it, it sounds like a reasonable approach. Something about the current system that gets me down is how useless my vote feels, I had to vote absentee since I was out of state for work at the time. My state was obviously decided well in advance, before my vote was probably even received or counted, I could've not voted, probably hundreds of thousands of people could've not voted and it wouldn't have mattered.

And that feels kinda shitty.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.