CORONAVIRUS Death Thread

[Nirgon]

Lots of retards that aren't displaying any kind of symptom trying to jack up the numbers. Read my CDC official post that you test positive for any number of corona viruses out there and not this Chinese one.

Back to school time! Some less fortunate children can't afford computers etc for remote learning. Maybe this stuff only applies to making people vote in person with an ID though. Fun fact, Mexico requires and ID to vote.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not an anti/pro "vaccer" or anything, but the situation is probably a bit more complicated than you might think. If human individuals are not vaccinated, what might happen is the virus infects someone but this virus mutates in this non-immunized host -- significantly enough that it is no longer be affected by the previous immunization.

Though somewhat different but along the same lines is the general reduction in doctors prescribing antibiotics, despite the fact they often work well and could serious improve a variety of situations patients might find themselves in, they can create resistant strains of bacteria, potentially rendering that very antibiotic useless.

This is fallacious thinking. First of all, there are already mutations extant so they will constantly be chasing their tail to create new vaccinations that target new mutations, and the research time is too lengthy to keep up with the mutations.

Second of all, the vaccines being researched are not your standard dead-bacteria vaccines designed to stimulate counter-antibody production, they are mRNA vaccinations that essentially alter your genome.

Third of all, Unless the populace was simultaneously vaccinated with a synchronized clock, gradual vaccination can not provide the safeguards against mutations detailed in your premise.


So, again, if vaccination is designed to immunize ones self against a known strain of the virus, and that is successful, then why is everyone else required to innoculate in order for your vaccination to be effective, and how do you propose the mechanics of a synchronized global innoculation program?

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Irregardless

Is not a word

[Nirgon]

hospitals and old people can be quarantined

this is over, the morons that were given power are losing in court left and right trying to shut down businesses

if you are under such oppression, lawyer up and win - one of my pals in discord took my advice and his wrestling camp is back open and operating

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by gherron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Vaccine is british: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53469839

All the advancements in medical care that get made in the US are not for plebs. Like, they'd probably have to become meth druglords as they battle cancer or something like that.

Also, Thailand has better equipment, better medical care, and better costs than the US (but that's not saying much I guess).

https://www.nationmaster.com/country...th-care-system

There are 23 vaccines being developed by various countries right now.

The US has far more than its market share, with Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca all moving into phase 3 very shortly, and a number of academic facilities also chasing the dragon, so to speak.

Cheers, you have 1.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is not a word

That was my point bud

[Nirgon]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

welcome to the its over thread

Disclaimer for the toxic sheep: I do not work at Time magazine

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is fallacious thinking. First of all, there are already mutations extant so they will constantly be chasing their tail to create new vaccinations that target new mutations, and the research time is too lengthy to keep up with the mutations.

Sure there are mutations already. The point is, have they mutated enough that the previous immunization is rendered obsolete?

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Second of all, the vaccines being researched are not your standard dead-bacteria vaccines designed to stimulate counter-antibody production, they are mRNA vaccinations that essentially alter your genome.

Modality of immunization doesn't really matter for what is being talked about here, though mrna might make it easier/quicker to address a new strain, it doesn't prevent a new strain from appearing.

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Third of all, Unless the populace was simultaneously vaccinated with a synchronized clock, gradual vaccination can not provide the safeguards against mutations detailed in your premise.

Not safe, safer.

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, again, if vaccination is designed to immunize ones self against a known strain of the virus, and that is successful, then why is everyone else required to innoculate in order for your vaccination to be effective, and how do you propose the mechanics of a synchronized global innoculation program?

The more people essentially incubating the virus/bacteria, the more likely that you eventually end up with a problematic mutant. It's really not that complicated.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure there are mutations already. The point is, have they mutated enough that the previous immunization is rendered obsolete?



Modality of immunization doesn't really matter for what is being talked about here, though mrna might make it easier/quicker to address a new strain, it doesn't prevent a new strain from appearing.



Not safe, safer.



The more people essentially incubating the virus/bacteria, the more likely that you eventually end up with a problematic mutant. It's really not that complicated.

My body, my choice...or is that only solid rationale when it comes to murdering babies?

[BlackBellamy]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My body, my choice...or is that only solid rationale when it comes to murdering babies?

You're not a human being unless you have a social security number. I mean yeah, it's a mild simplification of the current US foreign policy but can we agree to it internally please? This way we don't have to swim through pools of decaying baby tissue on the way to a real argument? We've been smashing their little heads on the rocks for eons now and it's never going to stop. Let's move on.