![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
![]() There is not much difference in the external terms on d80/d90 like you say, and the house is basically the same and hence where the choice is completely irrelevant.
The difference is, however, the inside,which the D90 has inherited from d300'an and things that are not found in any other camera from Nikon yet .. that movie function. But .. D80 is obviously still a great camera, but money is no problem to buy in on a newer system. D80/D90 is easy to grow in and is a full-featured D-SLR with many functions and is also beginner-friendly. | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() iTT: hipsters argue over who has the bigger zoom
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() D7000 is great for low noise high iso shooting. Its a bit high at $1300 for the body alone, but well worth it. Its a big upgrade from a D60 or D80. The D3100 or D5100 (or even the D3000 or D5000) would be better at low light shooting than the D80 or D60. I have a D50 which is similar to the D80 when it comes to noise, just a lower megapixel. The only usable iso is 200-400. The noise gets really bad anything above that. You can clean up alot of noise, but it sucks having to edit every shot about 400 iso. It also lowers the contrast when you do this, so it may not be as sharp.
__________________
Mokli - Druid of Karana
| ||
Last edited by moklianne; 06-17-2011 at 11:00 PM..
|
|
![]() |
|
|