Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You guys are analyzing this way too much. The reason for posting the percentage differences in the news post was not so that people could know exactly what the new ZEMs are, and people need to stop acting like they are entitled to know that. The reason we posted the percentage is so people know that some zones that were not worth exp'ing in before may now be worth it.
What some people have said is true, if a zone had a very low modifier before and it was increased by 50%, it's possible the new ZEM value is still lower than other zones. Whether that's the case or not, I'm not divulging. The point of all of this was, if you previously avoided a zone because it gave bad XP, well now it gives 50%, or 66%, or 88% more than it was before. So, go give it another shot.
|
You spent over a decade trying to (though let's not argue about the clearly non classic things there) deflect all the requests by players, in order to keep things classic on Blue for over a decade.
And this is a prime example of one.
Who gives a shit if no one went to those zones?
WHY must they go there?
One of the best things about them is that they ARE out of the way and therefore less populated.
If people are lazy and goto Guk, Mistmoore, City of Mist and Karnors, then let them - let the herd be the herd.
Quit trying to shoe horn the success of Green by making non classic changes.
Either it's good on it's own or it's not