#21
|
|||
|
I remember Shamans in 1999 being considered underpowered and Wizards needing nerfed. Sometimes I miss the days of not knowing.
| ||
|
#22
|
|||
|
Back in 99 the cap was 50 so Shaman didn't really come in to being overly strong til later. P99 will never truely be the real classic experience, just like Classic WoW isn't how it was back in 2005-6. To much is known, meta exists, etc.
| ||
|
#23
|
|||
|
I believe the classic shaman to be reasonably balanced but once you get lvl 51, turgurs insects, they become OP.
| ||
|
#24
|
||||
|
Quote:
I dont even care if the mithral 2h sword drops off of the froglock squire so long as whoever figures that out uses that power to be the top guild that year. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] We're talking a server where you might have a complete healing life sucking warrior as a class lol | |||
|
#25
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#26
|
|||
|
Do not worry even in mid to late 40s many shaman tanks out tank many tanks on green. They hold agro better and as a cleric healing them it's still 1 CH per mob... same as most tanks.
| ||
|
#27
|
||||
|
Quote:
Shaman's only defensive skill is dodge which maxes out at 75. Even a cleric would out-tank a shaman, and could hold aggro just as well using Stun. | |||
|
#28
|
||||
|
Quote:
They can be nice for groups but stack even worse for a six man, so any 40's+ xp group will never want to invite a second if they can help it, despite people claiming that slow tanking shaman are somehow common or welcome. You can of course solo well, if you can find the camp you want open these days. In the long run its not really the best choice for pick up grouping, nor for raiding unless you like death and constant buff requests. And to get to the super powerful level 60 solo god status you will need to acquire very rare and high priced Kunark drop spells. Good luck, have fun. | |||
|
|
|