group with SOLMN on green, maybe a little, you know you want to

[kaelseren]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd say normalizing the rhetoric of racial supremacy is bad enough on its own and doesn't need to be minimalized by abject comparison.

I have always been fascinated by the over generalized, nebulous and ambiguous terms of the marxist. What is "racial supremacy"? If you're claiming that anyone else is claiming they are "superior", who and what are they claiming they are superior with?

Let's start with the non existent "white supremacist" since in current year it is constantly thrown around. What are people claiming these whites assert they are "superior" about? Are you saying they are just going around saying they are superior because "reasons"? That seems a bit vague.

Maybe I can help you with your fuzzy perspective. Nobody seems to argue against the fact that greyhounds run fast, that great danes are large, or german shepherds are smart. Ok, now which is "superior"?

Normal people that haven't been inundated with marxist conditioning would say, "Well that depends on the task they are performing." SOOOOO, don't Erudites boast the highest INT in the game? Do they have "superior intelligence"? My guess is that you would have to concede that they do, right?

It is bizarre how people are so inculcated to find race and oppression behind every nook and cranny that they (You) would draw a parallel with a fictional race called Erudites with Black Africans simply because they share similar colors. Isn't that what marxists would consider racism? Leftists are just saturated with hypocrisy to the point that without hypocrisy leftists would cease to exist.

Do we ever hear from people like you that basketball is "racist" because there isn't racial parity? Nooooooooooope. Yet, the second one, and only one group is represented higher than another, it is "structural institutionalized inherent privileged racism of constructed bigotry of institutions" (Despite seeing the same stats worldwide) or some other bullshit pseudo-intellectual gibberish that sounds amazing to the demoralized self deprecating useful idiot. Same can be said with "Men commit more crime than women". No problems there making "stereotypes". However, when one particular demographic commits over half the murder then all of a sudden people like you refuse to get to the root causes and would rather say "That is an unfair stereotype because group B does it too". This world has become so batshit retarded that somehow anecdotal evidence is proof of anything. 1 out of 100 is the same as 99 out of 100. The only consistency is hating one group and excusing every other.

So now, I ask you, what is "racial supremacy" and who is claiming it and what metric are you saying they are claiming supremacy about? Then we can compare notes.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by kaelseren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's start with the non existent "white supremacist" since in current year it is constantly thrown around. What are people claiming these whites assert they are "superior" about? Are you saying they are just going around saying they are superior because "reasons"? That seems a bit vague.

Heather Heyer might disagree if she hadn't been killed by a white supremacist during the rally in Charlottesville.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by kaelseren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have always been fascinated by the over generalized, nebulous and ambiguous terms of the marxist. What is "racial supremacy"? If you're claiming that anyone else is claiming they are "superior", who and what are they claiming they are superior with?

Let's start with the non existent "white supremacist" since in current year it is constantly thrown around. What are people claiming these whites assert they are "superior" about? Are you saying they are just going around saying they are superior because "reasons"? That seems a bit vague.

Maybe I can help you with your fuzzy perspective. Nobody seems to argue against the fact that greyhounds run fast, that great danes are large, or german shepherds are smart. Ok, now which is "superior"?

Normal people that haven't been inundated with marxist conditioning would say, "Well that depends on the task they are performing." SOOOOO, don't Erudites boast the highest INT in the game? Do they have "superior intelligence"? My guess is that you would have to concede that they do, right?

It is bizarre how people are so inculcated to find race and oppression behind every nook and cranny that they (You) would draw a parallel with a fictional race called Erudites with Black Africans simply because they share similar colors. Isn't that what marxists would consider racism? Leftists are just saturated with hypocrisy to the point that without hypocrisy leftists would cease to exist.

Do we ever hear from people like you that basketball is "racist" because there isn't racial parity? Nooooooooooope. Yet, the second one, and only one group is represented higher than another, it is "structural institutionalized inherent privileged racism of constructed bigotry of institutions" (Despite seeing the same stats worldwide) or some other bullshit pseudo-intellectual gibberish that sounds amazing to the demoralized self deprecating useful idiot. Same can be said with "Men commit more crime than women". No problems there making "stereotypes". However, when one particular demographic commits over half the murder then all of a sudden people like you refuse to get to the root causes and would rather say "That is an unfair stereotype because group B does it too". This world has become so batshit retarded that somehow anecdotal evidence is proof of anything. 1 out of 100 is the same as 99 out of 100. The only consistency is hating one group and excusing every other.

So now, I ask you, what is "racial supremacy" and who is claiming it and what metric are you saying they are claiming supremacy about? Then we can compare notes.

I blame Nirgon for this post. I absolve the mentally ill author.

[aaezil]

Originally Posted by kaelseren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have always been fascinated by the over generalized, nebulous and ambiguous terms of the marxist. What is "racial supremacy"? If you're claiming that anyone else is claiming they are "superior", who and what are they claiming they are superior with?

Let's start with the non existent "white supremacist" since in current year it is constantly thrown around. What are people claiming these whites assert they are "superior" about? Are you saying they are just going around saying they are superior because "reasons"? That seems a bit vague.

Maybe I can help you with your fuzzy perspective. Nobody seems to argue against the fact that greyhounds run fast, that great danes are large, or german shepherds are smart. Ok, now which is "superior"?

Normal people that haven't been inundated with marxist conditioning would say, "Well that depends on the task they are performing." SOOOOO, don't Erudites boast the highest INT in the game? Do they have "superior intelligence"? My guess is that you would have to concede that they do, right?

It is bizarre how people are so inculcated to find race and oppression behind every nook and cranny that they (You) would draw a parallel with a fictional race called Erudites with Black Africans simply because they share similar colors. Isn't that what marxists would consider racism? Leftists are just saturated with hypocrisy to the point that without hypocrisy leftists would cease to exist.

Do we ever hear from people like you that basketball is "racist" because there isn't racial parity? Nooooooooooope. Yet, the second one, and only one group is represented higher than another, it is "structural institutionalized inherent privileged racism of constructed bigotry of institutions" (Despite seeing the same stats worldwide) or some other bullshit pseudo-intellectual gibberish that sounds amazing to the demoralized self deprecating useful idiot. Same can be said with "Men commit more crime than women". No problems there making "stereotypes". However, when one particular demographic commits over half the murder then all of a sudden people like you refuse to get to the root causes and would rather say "That is an unfair stereotype because group B does it too". This world has become so batshit retarded that somehow anecdotal evidence is proof of anything. 1 out of 100 is the same as 99 out of 100. The only consistency is hating one group and excusing every other.

So now, I ask you, what is "racial supremacy" and who is claiming it and what metric are you saying they are claiming supremacy about? Then we can compare notes.

I havent seen a worse post than this in years. I was going to make fun of you but i guess now ill just slow clap