why do dumb fucks right shit like PST in their auctions?

[Lhord99]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No such thing as an aggressive syntax. Don't use words you don't understand.

Sorry for the late post; was busy working an adult job. Incendiary language is, by proxy, aggressive. It’s 2020; the sooner you wake up to human emotions, the better.

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Lhord99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry for the late post; was busy working an adult job. Incendiary language is, by proxy, aggressive. It’s 2020; the sooner you wake up to human emotions, the better.

Again, syntax has nothing to do with the actual language but in the rules regarding the order it is arranged to properly convey meaning to an interpreter. it's like calling a mathematical function "aggressive". Though i have heard jokes of angry periodic functions.

[Lhord99]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, syntax has nothing to do with the actual language but in the rules regarding the order it is arranged to properly convey meaning to an interpreter. it's like calling a mathematical function "aggressive". Though i have heard jokes of angry periodic functions.

Fair illustration, but words communicate ideas. Numbers communicate quantity, generally.

Words, phrases, and their ordering. One could begin their statement with a rhetorical question, say, which would constitute a syntax that urges its speaker’s audience to embark on a line of reasoning. One might call this form of syntax ‘inquisitorial’. One could also begin their statement with hate-speech, which is an ordering of specific word choices intended to ostracize and alienate - one might call this aggressive syntax.