Why don't I see

[mimixownzall]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Linguistics does not = intelligence.

Women on average use a larger variety of words than men and speak more words per day but consistently score lower in cognitive reasoning.

Basically it means you are better at describing things but it doesn't really help if you can't grasp the subject matter.

And Wehrmacht wonders why he never gets laid.

[WizardEQ]

There is a theory that a person with an IQ of 160 would have difficulty conversing with someone with an IQ of 130, who in turn would have problems relaying ideas to one with an average IQ of 100.

The following post is from someone who addresses this gap. They are not my own words. Quite amusing. Parentheses I have added.



"Yes I think it (refers to gap) is. Much more so that any difference in age or ethnicity.

The reason being that there would always be frustration between them (man and woman), that they would not be able to converse at the same level.

The more intelligent one would therefore seek a mistress or a lover with whom they can have a sensible conversation. This could easily lead to an affair from which the marriage might well not survive.

It would get worse and worse the longer time went on and the older they get, since conversation is a key to good companionship once you hit middle-age, and takes over even from sex in old age.

I am middle-aged myself, but if I found a teenager, even right down to 16 (the legal minimum), who could match me intellectually, who had imagination and was eager to explore all sorts of philosophical ideas with me, I would consider her to be a much better marriage prospect than a woman in her 30s, more appropriate age-wise and probably more knowledgable about life and the world, but who was only interested in fashion, celebrities and soaps."

This is akin to how off-base some of the replies have been to my post. The 16 year minimum was news to me; maybe he was European.

[WizardEQ]

I don't know what it is about you, but I find you absolutely hilarious! Maybe it's the avatar coupled with your quips. You are very, very funny. You seem like a person to chew to fat with around a campfire.

[WizardEQ]

http://www.eskimo.com/~miyaguch/grady/nazi.html

[deathgirl]

Originally Posted by WizardEQ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Yes I think it (refers to gap) is. Much more so that any difference in age or ethnicity.

The reason being that there would always be frustration between them (man and woman), that they would not be able to converse at the same level.

The more intelligent one would therefore seek a mistress or a lover with whom they can have a sensible conversation. This could easily lead to an affair from which the marriage might well not survive.

It would get worse and worse the longer time went on and the older they get, since conversation is a key to good companionship once you hit middle-age, and takes over even from sex in old age.

I am middle-aged myself, but if I found a teenager, even right down to 16 (the legal minimum), who could match me intellectually, who had imagination and was eager to explore all sorts of philosophical ideas with me, I would consider her to be a much better marriage prospect than a woman in her 30s, more appropriate age-wise and probably more knowledgable about life and the world, but who was only interested in fashion, celebrities and soaps."

This is akin to how off-base some of the replies have been to my post. The 16 year minimum was news to me; maybe he was European.

If he is so smart, why did he marry someone who he isn't compatible with? OH THAS RITE ALL MEN THINK WITH THEIR DICKS REGARDLESS OF IQ


another femnazi reply brought 2 u by deathgirl who just entered her 20s and is bummed that teenage girls are more age appropriate for men of all ages

[PureLo]

not all men think that way deathgirl, sorry [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[deathgirl]

btw a teenager would definitely be more fitting for him intellectually because only teenagers still give a fuck about exploring philosophical ideas.

[deathgirl]

Originally Posted by PureLo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not all men think that way deathgirl, sorry [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hope not [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Knuckle]

Originally Posted by WizardEQ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't know what it is about you, but I find you absolutely hilarious! Maybe it's the avatar coupled with your quips. You are very, very funny. You seem like a person to chew to fat with around a campfire.

Well played, you hit me in my vulnerable chink, pride. I heartily accept your offer, I'll bring the iron rations.

[Krimsin]

Originally Posted by deathgirl [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

another femnazi reply brought 2 u by deathgirl who just entered her 20s and is bummed that teenage girls are more age appropriate for men of all ages

Which works because most women never grow out of either being fashion obsessed wasteful drones good only for fucking or the even larger population of uglies forming jealous inferiority complexes about those they wish they could be.

Congrats on helping to fill the cheap seats.