Enchanter charm isn't classic, we all know this

[Bazia]

heres this guide showing an ENC soloing naggy with a CH chain imp protector

looks like i win and 12 of the 14 classes available will be irrelevant

definitely not stoopid

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

heres this guide showing an ENC soloing naggy with a CH chain imp protector

looks like i win and 12 of the 14 classes available will be irrelevant

definitely not stoopid

Want a whaaaburger with your cries?

[jacob54311]

It wouldn't be unheard of for them to tweak something that was classic for purposes of overall gameplay being improved.

Chanter doesn't seem to be one of those things, though. They seem satisfied with how that class is functioning, despite it being so powerful. Might as well let it go.

[derpcake2]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

heres this guide showing an ENC soloing naggy with a CH chain imp protector

at what level does enchanter gain CH?

i know charming 3 imp protectors while having a clr along will let me kill naggy, but you are saying I can CH the imps myself?

[Vizax_Xaziv]

How did the Charm pets hold aggro on Naggy? While being CHed as well?

[bubur]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How did the Charm pets hold aggro on Naggy? While being CHed as well?

my guess is hes talking about the aoe/fear phases, where the raid force can intermittently go behind a corner to avoid dmg especially as a bunch of scrappy classic folks on the first dragon attempts

if seal teal did this as a primary strat, id call them foolish. if they held together a main tank death with an enc charm, it was pretty lucky... if it happened at all?

so basically nerf CH am i right guys? er wait. nerf corners

[Ligma]

I like how this thread has turned into complaining about an imp tanking naggy with soulfires. Even though it's on video and the warrior was tanking the whole time.

[Frostback]

WHY NOT CHARM! Reply... By: Anonymous
Posted @ Fri, Aug 25th 11:28 AM 2000 Score: Default[2.00]
I see such a waste in one of the greatest power enchanters commonly do not use. CHARM. This method requires you have faith in your healer. Basically, Head into a dungeon and charm a nuker for HOURS at a time. This charm will do twice the damage of any tanks in your group and is easy to keep.

https://web.archive.org/web/20020129...s=13&start=450

Sounds like people were charming back in the day just fine.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Hazek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I may be a highly intuitive pisces, but your tone is obvious. And that doesn't answer the question besides that you're jealous of a more powerful class that you don't want to play. Ok then.



Now we found the real reason because this is deeper than a simple, "I just want the game to be balanced." You don't want them getting all the loot so "easily". Would you feel differently if you were in the raid? Rhetorical question.

Exactly lol. This isn’t about disinterested people for no reason just adamantly wanting “balance”. It’s because they’re annoyed there’s a powerful solo class competing with them for camps and loot. Wouldn’t be surprised if half these people are playing other solo classes.

And nerfing enchanters won’t solve the issue. That these people have because everyone wanting to solo on enchanters will just re-roll necros. So you’d really need to nerf every class so they can’t solo in order to resolve the true thing people have an issue with

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Frostback [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://web.archive.org/web/20020129...s=13&start=450

Sounds like people were charming back in the day just fine.

Damn did this just end the thread? Probably not because what people really want is less competition for loot

Like I said earlier, by around Kunark launch people were charming with pretty good frequency