![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What will be your primary class on Green, considering the Classic changes? | |||
| Bard |
|
41 | 7.18% |
| Cleric |
|
53 | 9.28% |
| Druid |
|
67 | 11.73% |
| Enchanter |
|
64 | 11.21% |
| Magician |
|
39 | 6.83% |
| Monk |
|
26 | 4.55% |
| Necromancer |
|
52 | 9.11% |
| Paladin |
|
29 | 5.08% |
| Ranger |
|
36 | 6.30% |
| Rogue |
|
31 | 5.43% |
| Shadow Knight |
|
34 | 5.95% |
| Shaman |
|
46 | 8.06% |
| Warrior |
|
27 | 4.73% |
| Wizard |
|
26 | 4.55% |
| Voters: 571. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#231
|
|||
|
These poll results actually look fairly classic as I recall classic population being on Brell Serilis server in 1999.
One difference would be a lot less enchanters and a lot more monks. I actually remember chanters being kind of rare, it was kind of a treat when you got one in your group. On a side note, it will be interesting to see how many people stick with chanter when they don't have +55 hp rings from level 1 and tab cycle targeting. I remember chanters dropping really fast when they drew aggro. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#232
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#233
|
|||
|
If this poll has any accuracy at all, tanks are going to be in high demand
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#234
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#235
|
||||
|
Quote:
Consider that other classes can get by as tanks too, with no melee you just use pets, and that mostly non-tanks will spend time soloing... and the proportion of tanks to groups will be fine. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#236
|
|||
|
Okay good points there. I wasn’t thinking classically enough haha.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#237
|
|||
|
1 in 6 exact amount for grouping.
Especially since druids and necros won't be grouping once they're through the nooblevels. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#238
|
|||
|
I'm actually, surprisingly, having trouble picking my main.
I was all set to do cleric as a break from an enchanter main character (or ONLY character for the last like 4 years, really). I've played them before, they're great in groups and raids and even have legit solo in classic era, and you can squeeze more than a healbot out of them if you're not feeling lazy. But then every time someone says something that is (to me) dumb about enchanters, it makes me want to play an enchanter to make the bad enchanters look bad. But suddenly, randomly, I thought maybe I should try shaman, one of the few classes I never played in classic (on blue) or took to 60 after Kunark. Hmmmmm. Shaman has more exp/farm options cause I'd be evil, plus alchemy might entertain me. Cleric is more of a sure thing to be useful in raids or get into groups. Enchanter I'd feel absolutely no desire in trying to get a guise (shaman) or manastone (cleric) for, so that'd be a nice weight off my shoulders. Hmmmmmmmmmmm. | ||
|
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 10-24-2019 at 06:27 PM..
|
|
||
|
#239
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#240
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'd definitely pursue the guise with a shaman, though more for being able to be a little shrunk while outdoors than for the fashionquest. I actually enjoy being an ugly-ass female troll or ogre. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|