When people say you are paranoid about the government taking your guns

[FatherSioux]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the US government is bombing civilian populations, then the international community will support the citizens and they will be much more motivated to by the fact that there are 300+ million firearms already in our possession.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the US government is bombing civilian populations, then the international community will support the citizens and they will be much more motivated to by the fact that there are 300+ million firearms already in our possession.

so you're saying france is a better deterrence against tyranny than your shooty bang bang toys?

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so you're saying france is a better deterrence against tyranny than your shooty bang bang toys?

Nope, I'm saying the exact opposite of that.

Top notch reading comprehension there, bud.

they will be much more motivated to by the fact that there are 300+ million firearms already in our possession.

[maskedmelon]

@Wonkie: you disabled PMs duder, so i can't respond that way. here's my answer though:

in general, they are. rather than guessing at the point you wanted to make though, I'll let you make it and then respond ^^




also, i just ate 4oz of Gouda, many spinach leafs and 1.8g of sodium. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

God what a stupid argument. Yeah, you've got some AK-47s ... that's going to do a whole lot of good if the government shows up on your doorstep with a tank (or a nuke).

Sorry crazy conspiracy people, if the government wants to take over, they can and will, because they have vastly superior weaponry. The 2nd amendment isn't what protects your freedom: it's our democratic system of checks and balances.

The day that fails all the guns you can hoard won't do shit when the corrupt government drops a bomb from a plane on you.

Only folks who haven't thought this through make this "argument."

The government can't go door to door with tanks (let alone nukes. Are you fucking retarded? LOL WE'LL JUST USE A TACTICAL NUKE ON EACH OF THE 80 MILLION HOMES IN THE US THAT HAVE A FIREARM IN THEM WHAT COULD GO WRONG?!?!?!). Private ownership of small arms is as potent nowadays as it was in the American revolution.

[azeth]

Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Private ownership of small arms is as potent nowadays as it was in the American revolution.

His example of nukes diluted his valid point; you couldn't be more wrong.

Any civilian who believes their AR15 is protecting them from the US Military is out. of. their. mind.

[Topgunben]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

His example of nukes diluted his valid point; you couldn't be more wrong.

Any civilian who believes their AR15 is protecting them from the US Military is out. of. their. mind.

I guess rock throwing would be more effective? SMH

[azeth]

Originally Posted by Topgunben [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess rock throwing would be more effective? SMH

Google some combat footage videos. let me know how the Marines respond when shots are fired.

Spoiler - they don't fire back with small arms fire.

[Jaxon]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Google some combat footage videos. let me know how the Marines respond when shots are fired.

Spoiler - they don't fire back with small arms fire.

That's why you shoot their families instead. We know who they are, and they're vulnerable. Go against the soft targets, not the hard ones.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

His example of nukes diluted his valid point; you couldn't be more wrong.

Any civilian who believes their AR15 is protecting them from the US Military is out. of. their. mind.

The Taliban defended themselves with Lee Enfield No. 4's (bolt action rifles, used in WW2)

The AR15 is the civilian platform of what the military currently uses.

The only difference is that it is semi-auto and not select fire.

And no, that doesn't make a difference. Full-auto is only used by idiots in action movies.