I N D I C T E D

[Jaxon]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The investigation "established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts." - Robert S. Mueller

The investigation didn't conclude that a conspiracy took place but show me where it says "no conspiracy took place."

It's not to job of law enforcement to prove that things didn't happen, because that's impossible. All they can do is look at the evidence there is and determine whether or not it's sufficient to prove conspiracy, and it Trump's case it did not. So in the eyes of the law, no conspiracy took place.

Also regarding that quote from the report, there's nothing criminal about Trump figuring out that Democrat emails getting leaked would help him win. Having a standard that low kind of makes everyone a criminal.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not to job of law enforcement to prove that things didn't happen, because that's impossible. All they can do is look at the evidence there is and determine whether or not it's sufficient to prove conspiracy, and it Trump's case it did not. So in the eyes of the law, no conspiracy took place.

Also regarding that quote from the report, there's nothing criminal about Trump figuring out that Democrat emails getting leaked would help him win. Having a standard that low kind of makes everyone a criminal.

[AenorVZ]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not to job of law enforcement to prove that things didn't happen, because that's impossible. All they can do is look at the evidence there is and determine whether or not it's sufficient to prove conspiracy.

Law enforcement doesn't prove conspiracy. Law enforcement investigates and determines if there is sufficient evidence to recommend the case to a prosecutorial body for potential charges where the charges will then be proven or disproven in the appropriate venue. In this case, the venue is Congress. Haven't you ever watched Law & Order? As per the quote in my previous post, Mueller left it to the discretion of Congress to pursue it further, just as any decent investigator would.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Law enforcement doesn't prove conspiracy. Law enforcement investigates and determines if there is sufficient evidence to recommend the case to a prosecutorial body for potential charges where the charges will then be proven or disproven in the appropriate venue. In this case, the venue is Congress. Haven't you ever watched Law & Order? As per the quote in my previous post, Mueller left it to the discretion of Congress to pursue it further, just as any decent investigator would.

Read Page 2 of the Report.

It proves you wrong.

[AenorVZ]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Read Page 2 of the Report.

"A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts." - Page 2

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts." - Page 2

So you didn't read page 2 then lol

[AenorVZ]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you didn't read page 2 then lol

Yep. Read it. Have posted excerpts. If you think there's a specific section that proves anything, post away.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yep. Read it. Have posted excerpts. If you think there's a specific section that proves anything, post away.

Doesn't appear that you have based on your previous comment.

[DMN]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Law enforcement doesn't prove conspiracy. Law enforcement investigates and determines if there is sufficient evidence to recommend the case to a prosecutorial body for potential charges where the charges will then be proven or disproven in the appropriate venue. In this case, the venue is Congress. Haven't you ever watched Law & Order? As per the quote in my previous post, Mueller left it to the discretion of Congress to pursue it further, just as any decent investigator would.

Congress doesn't have any prosecutorial powers, you fuckng retard.

[AenorVZ]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Congress doesn't have any prosecutorial powers, you fuckng retard.

This is what I mean when I say smattering of dimwits. This vegetable apparently skipped school they day civics class talked about impeachment.