I N D I C T E D

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the report was exculpatory, it would be plastered across billboards. Instead Barr has released 48 words including numerous sentence fragments. I wouldn't be worried at all if I was Trump.

It was plastered all over billboards.

It's just people like you refuse to believe it.

[Jaxon]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the report was exculpatory, it would be plastered across billboards. Instead Barr has released 48 words including numerous sentence fragments. I wouldn't be worried at all if I was Trump.

The attorneys on the special council have complained, anonymously, about Barr not releasing more detail. They have not complained that his conclusions were wrong as a matter of law. Their complaint is that Barr didn't include all the evidence of Trump's activities that, in the end, did not amount to a crime.

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The attorneys on the special council have complained, anonymously, about Barr not releasing more detail. They have not complained that his conclusions were wrong as a matter of law. Their complaint is that Barr didn't include all the evidence of Trump's activities that, in the end, did not amount to a crime.

"These people" are janitors at CNN. But they know their stuff according to my aunt's uncle's taxi driver who has intimate knowledge of the situation. Why don't they put their names out there -- which wouldn't be illegal-- but lend credibility to the claim.

[Jaxon]

I think they're legitimate because their claims aren't too extraordinary. It would be the most natural thing in the world for a report summarizing an intense investigation that took two years to be full of things that sound suspicious when you first hear them, but amount to nothing when you look a little closer.

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think they're legitimate because their claims aren't too extraordinary. It would be the most natural thing in the world for a report summarizing an intense investigation that took two years to be full of things that sound suspicious when you first hear them, but amount to nothing when you look a little closer.

Nonsense. You are suggesting someone whose very job description entails examining exactly these sorts of things yet isn't aware of it?

[Wonkie]

that's how effective the noise machine is, previous models of American citizen would be up in arms, and today we're splitting hairs over the specific legal technicalities like we know a fuck

pacification through pedantry

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that's how effective the noise machine is, previous models of American citizen would be up in arms, and today we're splitting hairs over the specific legal technicalities like we know a fuck

pacification through pedantry

Nope, previous Americans would've been too smart to be swayed by people like Louise Mensch.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope, previous Americans would've been too smart to be swayed by people like Louise Mensch.

Aenor is one of them shareblue guys, if that was real, or at least that's what he claimed.

name one right-wing grifter with a better track than "steve bannon is getting the death penalty" lmao

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Aenor is one of them shareblue guys, if that was real, or at least that's what he claimed.

name one right-wing grifter with a better track than "steve bannon is getting the death penalty" lmao

He probably thinks ShareBlue is a legitimate and trustworthy news source.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He probably thinks ShareBlue is a legitimate and trustworthy news source.

sorry, i thought that was the 'paid to post4Hillary' thing yall went kookoo about in 2016. he's claimed that.

not true?