Drusella Player Agreement?

[aaezil]

Also what you remember from live or how it “used to be” here is completel irrelevant - all that matters is how things work now (i remember the avg level being 40 in velious era and its 60 here. I remember camp rules being whoever got xp got loot rights even for raid mobs. I remember no clickies. I remember nobody knowing about recharging. Doesnt mean thats the way its ever gonna be here.)

[Peener]

Lucan spawns on his own. No ph. Yet hes a camp and you need to clear his room to have any claim to it. Drusella is the same way. (Or should be if isnt currently)

This was helpful. Thank you.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Peener [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This was helpful. Thank you.

Lucan wasnt always a camp on P99 neither was DS. Someone arbitrarily declared Lucan as a camp one day despite nothing about it resembling an Everquest camp besides the simple “waiting” part.

[aaezil]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lucan wasnt always a camp on P99 neither was DS. Someone arbitrarily declared Lucan as a camp one day despite nothing about it resembling an Everquest camp besides the simple “waiting” part.

Will repeat just cause it “used to be different” doesnt mean thats the way it works today. That “someone” you are referencing was a gm who was tired of people rules lawyering/bickering about lucan ( People arguing hes fte) and just said heres how it is.

So looks like the options are go thru the same thing as what went on with lucan which will lead gms to the same exact ruling or just go with the obvious precedent from the beginning. I know which im choosing!

[Erati]

Originally Posted by aaezil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Will repeat just cause it “used to be different” doesnt mean thats the way it works today. That “someone” you are referencing was a gm who was tired of people rules lawyering/bickering about lucan ( People arguing hes fte) and just said heres how it is.

So looks like the options are go thru the same thing as what went on with lucan which will lead gms to the same exact ruling or just go with the obvious precedent from the beginning. I know which im choosing!

So why is DS different, no one but players who wish to sit there for 12+ hours feels it should be a camp. Like Scout etc one day it just took enough people agreeing w how the spawn should be handled.

[aaezil]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why is DS different, no one but playerslaw
M
lk who wish to sit there for 12+ hours feels it should be a camp. Like Scout etc one day peoit just took enough people agreeing w how the spawn should be handled.

You want to change a precedent because player agreements can be reached? Fine - do what we did at shady goblin and get every player to agree that ds is fte and have it work consistently and publish it on the forums and boom theres your player agreement.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by aaezil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You want to change a precedent because player agreements can be reached? Fine - do what we did at shady goblin and get every player to agree that ds is fte and have it work consistently and publish it on the forums and boom theres your player agreement.

Im not trying to change a thing, just pointing out the inconsistencies on why it really shouldnt be considered a camp.

I understand shit is hard to change and I dont care personally which way DS is handled.

But its laughable that people are beating their chests w very thin lines of what makes her a camp.